Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use rename of directories instead of symbolic links in boot partition. #1967

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

valentindavid
Copy link
Contributor

This implements @AdrianVovk idea from #1719 (comment) to solve issue #1719.

This uses renameat2 to do atomic swap of the loader directory in the
boot partition. It fallsback to non-atomic rename. This stays atomic
on filesystems supporting links but also provide a non-atomic behavior
when filesystem does not provide any atomic alternative.

This is working with SystemD boot on EFI using boot loader
specifications.

There is still the issue of losing /loader/loader.conf with SystemD
boot. Maybe we should think about copying other files from previous loader directories.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: valentindavid
To complete the pull request process, please assign cgwalters
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @cgwalters in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @valentindavid. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a ostreedev member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rh-atomic-bot
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?
I understand the following commands:

  • bot, add author to whitelist
  • bot, test pull request
  • bot, test pull request once

@AdrianVovk
Copy link

The challenge with this is that the ESP is vfat, and therefore rename will always be non-atomic. It's still better than what I'm doing now (manually copying files into /efi)

#1951
^ here's a proposed solution that I think could solve this same problem without needing the renameat2 call.

@rh-atomic-bot
Copy link

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #1767) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

gnomesysadmins pushed a commit to GNOME/gnome-build-meta that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2020
Systemd boot requires the boot partition to be the EFI partition which
means FAT is required. OSTree uses symlinking as a way to do atomic
update.

There is no solution yet for atomic update of FAT partitions. THis
patch however changes symlinking by doing directory move which can be
atomic in conditions. In practice filesystems with symbolic link
support usually also support atomic rename of directories. But this
allows to also work when no atomic update is working.

Patch was submitted upstream as
ostreedev/ostree#1967
gnomesysadmins pushed a commit to GNOME/gnome-build-meta that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2020
Systemd boot requires the boot partition to be the EFI partition which
means FAT is required. OSTree uses symlinking as a way to do atomic
update.

There is no solution yet for atomic update of FAT partitions. THis
patch however changes symlinking by doing directory move which can be
atomic in conditions. In practice filesystems with symbolic link
support usually also support atomic rename of directories. But this
allows to also work when no atomic update is working.

Patch was submitted upstream as
ostreedev/ostree#1967
gnomesysadmins pushed a commit to GNOME/gnome-build-meta that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2020
Systemd boot requires the boot partition to be the EFI partition which
means FAT is required. OSTree uses symlinking as a way to do atomic
update.

There is no solution yet for atomic update of FAT partitions. THis
patch however changes symlinking by doing directory move which can be
atomic in conditions. In practice filesystems with symbolic link
support usually also support atomic rename of directories. But this
allows to also work when no atomic update is working.

Patch was submitted upstream as
ostreedev/ostree#1967
gnomesysadmins pushed a commit to GNOME/gnome-build-meta that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2020
Systemd boot requires the boot partition to be the EFI partition which
means FAT is required. OSTree uses symlinking as a way to do atomic
update.

There is no solution yet for atomic update of FAT partitions. THis
patch however changes symlinking by doing directory move which can be
atomic in conditions. In practice filesystems with symbolic link
support usually also support atomic rename of directories. But this
allows to also work when no atomic update is working.

Patch was submitted upstream as
ostreedev/ostree#1967
gnomesysadmins pushed a commit to GNOME/gnome-build-meta that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2020
Systemd boot requires the boot partition to be the EFI partition which
means FAT is required. OSTree uses symlinking as a way to do atomic
update.

There is no solution yet for atomic update of FAT partitions. THis
patch however changes symlinking by doing directory move which can be
atomic in conditions. In practice filesystems with symbolic link
support usually also support atomic rename of directories. But this
allows to also work when no atomic update is working.

Patch was submitted upstream as
ostreedev/ostree#1967
gnomesysadmins pushed a commit to GNOME/gnome-build-meta that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2020
Systemd boot requires the boot partition to be the EFI partition which
means FAT is required. OSTree uses symlinking as a way to do atomic
update.

There is no solution yet for atomic update of FAT partitions. THis
patch however changes symlinking by doing directory move which can be
atomic in conditions. In practice filesystems with symbolic link
support usually also support atomic rename of directories. But this
allows to also work when no atomic update is working.

Patch was submitted upstream as
ostreedev/ostree#1967
@bam80
Copy link

bam80 commented Feb 21, 2020

Is this PR still proposed or abandoned?

@valentindavid
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is this PR still proposed or abandoned?

I can rebase and take care of it a bit. But since there was no interaction from maintainers, then I am not sure whether they are considering it.

@bam80
Copy link

bam80 commented Mar 23, 2020

@valentindavid have you been able to pay some attention to this issue again? The changes are highly anticipated here, in one form or another. Thanks.

@jjardon
Copy link
Contributor

jjardon commented Apr 7, 2020

@mwleeds @rfairley any chance to take a look to this? We currently need this to make GNOME images work, see https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/-/commit/79fb62e0d243a21ab58dc1dda439c23db5d474ab

@jjardon
Copy link
Contributor

jjardon commented May 30, 2020

@cgwalters Hey! Any chance to take a look to this?

@bam80
Copy link

bam80 commented Aug 6, 2020

Friendly ping.

@AdrianVovk
Copy link

@valentindavid This PR conflicts with upstream again. GNOME OS uses an ancient version of OSTree so they have yet to run into this issue, but on my OS I just updated to the latest version and I'm about to be downgrading again because this patch is broken.

@cgwalters Is there any chance for this patch to be reviewed or considered at all? Without this patch, I have to follow every single ostree admin deploy anywhere in the process of building, generating ISOs, installing the OS, and updating the OS with a bunch of ugly commands that mess with the contents of the ESP. With this patch, it just works. OSTree operates on BLS files, but has yet to support the bootloader that was actually built for the standard 🤷

@damianatorrpm
Copy link

updated.txt
Rebased patch file.

@kowalski7cc
Copy link

Any news on this?

@jjardon
Copy link
Contributor

jjardon commented Sep 8, 2021

In case is useful, this patch has been updated in GNOME OS to work with libostree-2021.2: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/-/blob/41.rc/files/ostree/no-boot-symlink.patch

@AdrianVovk
Copy link

carbonOS has been using this patch for a while. It works flawlessly so far! Hopefully this will get merged at some point...

@jjardon that same patch works for 2021.3 also

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

Hi, sorry about the delay.

I am OK in principle with the idea and code. But I'd like to have some design to close the atomicity hole longer term.

If you (or someone else) doesn't mind rebasing we can try to get this merged.

Copy link
Member

@dbnicholson dbnicholson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't finish thinking through all of this, but I wouldn't want to merge this without a lot more comments and tests. Is the symlink fallback path tested at all?

GError **error)
{
if (renameat2(olddirfd, oldpath, newdirfd, newpath, RENAME_EXCHANGE) == 0)
return TRUE;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're not setting the is_atomic out parameter here or in the other renameat2 success case below.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We start within ostree_sysroot_write_deployments_with_options with:

    bootloader_is_atomic = bootloader != NULL && _ostree_bootloader_is_atomic (bootloader);

Then we only mark bootloader_is_atomic as FALSE if we do not manage to do a renameat2. But if we manage, we want to still keep FALSE if that was the value given by _ostree_bootloader_is_atomic.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, I missed that part.

/* We generate the symlink on disk, then potentially do a syncfs() to ensure
* that it (and everything else we wrote) has hit disk. Only after that do we
* rename it into place.
*/
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please don't remove comments like this. This is some of the most sensitive code in ostree. If anything, it should have a lot more comments and I don't see any in the code you've added.

if (errno != ENOENT)
return glnx_throw_errno_prefix (error, "renameat2");

if (renameat2(olddirfd, oldpath, newdirfd, newpath, RENAME_NOREPLACE) == 0)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nitpicky, but space before parentheses here and in a few other spots.

g_string_truncate (buf, 0); g_string_append_printf (buf, "boot/loader.%d", self->bootversion);
if (!glnx_shutil_rm_rf_at (self->sysroot_fd, buf->str, cancellable, error))
return FALSE;
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this logic even right? In swap_bootloader, loader.<newversion> is exchanged with loader. That means that the current bootloader directory is now named loader.<newversion>. What's even at loader.<currentversion>? This is also in conflict with the code below that cleans up loader.<currentversion>. So, after this change, there's no more loader.* bootloader directories left. Is that correct?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right. Only loader directory is left after deployment is finished successfully. We could just use loader.tmp and loader. But if I remember correctly, we need to support older deployments that are still using symlinks. For that reason we still to need to keep this 0/1 version names. Also maintaining a patch for long term I cannot really afford changing too much the logic.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reading the code, I do not think the support for older deployment is working. I will try to add tests for that.

This uses `renameat2` to do atomic swap of the loader directory in the
boot partition. It fallsback to non-atomic rename. This stays atomic
on filesystems supporting links but also provide a non-atomic behavior
when filesystem does not provide any atomic alternative.

This is working with SystemD boot on EFI using boot loader
specifications.

There is still the issue of losing `/loader/loader.conf` with SystemD
boot.
@dbnicholson
Copy link
Member

I'm still not totally sure what the best approach here is, but I think the fundamental change from replacing loader to exchanging loader is likely to have subtle effects that need more detailed analysis.

Since the replacing process needs to be supported in case RENAME_EXCHANGE is not available or there's no existing loader, I think the best approach would be to make it always work as if it's replacing. An approach I think would work is:

  1. Use the existing symlink replacement, which involves creating a temporary loader.tmp symlink and the renaming it to loader. This is the simple tried and true approach.
  2. If symlinking fails because of EPERM, then recursively copy the new loader directory to loader.tmp and then exchange it with loader using RENAME_EXCHANGE + the renaming fallbacks you already coded. When exchanging has occurred, recursively delete the exchanged loader.tmp directory.

@dbnicholson dbnicholson mentioned this pull request Feb 4, 2022
22 tasks
ricardosalveti added a commit to ricardosalveti/ostree that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2022
Allow manipulating and updating /boot/loader entries under a normal
directory, as well as using symbolic links.

For directories this uses `renameat2` to do atomic swap of the loader
directory in the boot partition. It fallsback to non-atomic rename.
This stays atomic on filesystems supporting links but also provide
a non-atomic behavior when filesystem does not provide any atomic
alternative.

/boot/loader as a normal directory is needed by systemd-boot support,
and can be stored under the EFI ESP vfat partition.

Based on the original implementation done by Valentin David
at ostreedev#1967.

Tests were duplicated for simplicity reasons.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <ricardo@foundries.io>
ricardosalveti added a commit to ricardosalveti/ostree that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2022
Allow manipulating and updating /boot/loader entries under a normal
directory, as well as using symbolic links.

For directories this uses `renameat2` to do atomic swap of the loader
directory in the boot partition. It fallsback to non-atomic rename.
This stays atomic on filesystems supporting links but also provide
a non-atomic behavior when filesystem does not provide any atomic
alternative.

/boot/loader as a normal directory is needed by systemd-boot support,
and can be stored under the EFI ESP vfat partition.

Based on the original implementation done by Valentin David
at ostreedev#1967.

Tests were duplicated for simplicity reasons.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <ricardo@foundries.io>
@martinezjavier
Copy link
Contributor

Since the replacing process needs to be supported in case RENAME_EXCHANGE is not available

@dbnicholson FYI, I worked on a patch series to add RENAME_EXCHANGE support to vfat, latest revision is: https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/6/1/1049

@dbnicholson
Copy link
Member

Since the replacing process needs to be supported in case RENAME_EXCHANGE is not available

@dbnicholson FYI, I worked on a patch series to add RENAME_EXCHANGE support to vfat, latest revision is: https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/6/1/1049

That's great. Of course, you'd still need to support the fallback since it will be some time until that's commonly available (presuming it gets merged).

I've come around a bit on this idea in the sense that I think it's reasonable to assume RENAME_EXCHANGE as the primary mechanism since there will always be filesystems like vfat that can't do symlinks but presumably they can all gain support for RENAME_EXCHANGE. However, I still feel like any major changes in this area require exhaustive testing.

@ricardosalveti
Copy link
Contributor

ricardosalveti commented Jun 3, 2022

I'm currently playing with ricardosalveti@731b73f, which is based on the original patch from this PR, which keeps the current behavior for new systems and systems that are already deployed, but also supports loader as a directory (relying on RENAME_EXCHANGE).

That way I can create new deployments (using systemd-boot) with the extra kernel patches without breaking my current deployments that are ok with links (using grub / u-boot).

Still validating with my yocto integration, can post the final set after I'm done testing it.

@martinezjavier
Copy link
Contributor

martinezjavier commented Jun 14, 2022

FYI the patch-set got merged by a subsystem maintainer and are heading towards the Linux v6.0 release.

@gdonval gdonval mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2022
@cgwalters cgwalters removed the size/L label May 2, 2023
quaresmajose pushed a commit to quaresmajose/ostree that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2023
Allow manipulating and updating /boot/loader entries under a normal
directory, as well as using symbolic links.

For directories this uses `renameat2` to do atomic swap of the loader
directory in the boot partition. It fallsback to non-atomic rename.
This stays atomic on filesystems supporting links but also provide
a non-atomic behavior when filesystem does not provide any atomic
alternative.

/boot/loader as a normal directory is needed by systemd-boot support,
and can be stored under the EFI ESP vfat partition.

Based on the original implementation done by Valentin David
at ostreedev#1967.

Tests were duplicated for simplicity reasons.

Upstream-Status: Pending

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <ricardo@foundries.io>

%% original patch: 0003-Add-support-for-directories-instead-of-symbolic-link.patch
quaresmajose pushed a commit to quaresmajose/ostree that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2023
Allow manipulating and updating /boot/loader entries under a normal
directory, as well as using symbolic links.

For directories this uses `renameat2` to do atomic swap of the loader
directory in the boot partition. It fallsback to non-atomic rename.
This stays atomic on filesystems supporting links but also provide
a non-atomic behavior when filesystem does not provide any atomic
alternative.

/boot/loader as a normal directory is needed by systemd-boot support,
and can be stored under the EFI ESP vfat partition.

Based on the original implementation done by Valentin David
at ostreedev#1967.

Tests were duplicated for simplicity reasons.

Upstream-Status: Pending

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <ricardo@foundries.io>

%% original patch: 0003-Add-support-for-directories-instead-of-symbolic-link.patch
quaresmajose pushed a commit to quaresmajose/ostree that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2023
Allow manipulating and updating /boot/loader entries under a normal
directory, as well as using symbolic links.

For directories this uses `renameat2` to do atomic swap of the loader
directory in the boot partition. It fallsback to non-atomic rename.
This stays atomic on filesystems supporting links but also provide
a non-atomic behavior when filesystem does not provide any atomic
alternative.

/boot/loader as a normal directory is needed by systemd-boot support,
and can be stored under the EFI ESP vfat partition.

Based on the original implementation done by Valentin David
at ostreedev#1967.

Tests were duplicated for simplicity reasons.

Upstream-Status: Pending

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <ricardo@foundries.io>

%% original patch: 0003-Add-support-for-directories-instead-of-symbolic-link.patch
quaresmajose pushed a commit to quaresmajose/ostree that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2023
Allow manipulating and updating /boot/loader entries under a normal
directory, as well as using symbolic links.

For directories this uses `renameat2` to do atomic swap of the loader
directory in the boot partition. It fallsback to non-atomic rename.
This stays atomic on filesystems supporting links but also provide
a non-atomic behavior when filesystem does not provide any atomic
alternative.

/boot/loader as a normal directory is needed by systemd-boot support,
and can be stored under the EFI ESP vfat partition.

Based on the original implementation done by Valentin David
at ostreedev#1967.

Tests were duplicated for simplicity reasons.

Upstream-Status: Pending

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Salveti <ricardo@foundries.io>

%% original patch: 0003-Add-support-for-directories-instead-of-symbolic-link.patch
@GrabbenD
Copy link

GrabbenD commented Aug 29, 2023

Is GNOME OS's patch still the best workaround until this is finished?
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/-/blob/45.beta/files/ostree/no-boot-symlink.patch

Edit: looks like it doesn't work with 2023.6 update

@GrabbenD
Copy link

GrabbenD commented Sep 14, 2023

I ended up working around this issue by making / a ext4 partition and then I mounted ESP on /boot/efi which makes /boot ext4 thus allowing symbolic links

Here's the commands if anyone else is stuck on Preparing final bootloader swap: symlinkat: Operation not permitted error:
M1cha/archlinux-ostree#1 (comment)

@bam80
Copy link

bam80 commented Mar 12, 2024

update?

@dbnicholson
Copy link
Member

I've thought about this several times as I would really like to have this in Endless to support our systemd-boot systems. What always makes me anxious is trying to figure out how to handle compatibility with the vast majority of our systems that have symlink based deployments. There are 2 main issues I'm concerned with:

  • The semantics of the deployment are different if loader is a symlink to a loader.N directory versus loader itself being a directory. What do the swapped loader.N directories mean in pure directory mode? I think the answer is that they don't really match the semantics of the symlink deployment. It's essentially a different algorithm even though it's seemingly only a small change from the symlink approach.
  • What do you do with systems that already have symlink based deployments? Potentially you could write a migration to the directory scheme, but that means you can't roll back to a system with a libostree that doesn't understand the directory scheme.

So, to me this requires a couple additional pieces of implementation and policy.

  • The directory deployment scheme is treated separately from the symlink deployment scheme. Your system can be in one scheme or the other, but the semantics are different and shouldn't be mixed.
  • If your system is already using a symlink based deployment, it should stay that way. You can opt in to a migration to the directory scheme, but this means you may potentially lose roll back targets. At Endless we'd do that at some major version check point and probably have to delete some old deployments to ensure users didn't try to roll back to a system where they'd be screwed. Or maybe we'd never migrate anyone because the downsides are too great.
  • If you're on a new deployment (i.e., no existing /boot/loader or /boot/ostree), then the directory scheme is preferred.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet