SwiftPM: Implement support for local dependencies
#8267
Conversation
Reduce the diff of a following change (which will re-generate the lockfile as well). Signed-off-by: Frank Viernau <frank_viernau@epam.com>
Prepare for adding a `local` dependency, which requires tooling version 5.7. As that tooling version starts to fail with an error when library projects contain `main.swift` files, simpliy rename these files. Signed-off-by: Frank Viernau <frank_viernau@epam.com>
Add a synthetic package with one dependency and make it a `local` dependency of the `project-with-localfile`. SwiftPM does not add an entry for the local dependency to the lockfile, which is why the functions which map from `PinV2` to ORT's model are not updated. Signed-off-by: Frank Viernau <frank_viernau@epam.com>
fviernau
changed the title
local dependencies
| @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ | |||
| // swift-tools-version:5.7 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Commit message: project-with-localfile -> project-with-lockfile?
| @@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ | |||
| "repositoryURL": "https://github.com/apple/swift-collections.git", | |||
| "state": { | |||
| "branch": null, | |||
| "revision": "d029d9d39c87bed85b1c50adee7c41795261a192", | |||
| "version": "1.0.6" | |||
| "revision": "94cf62b3ba8d4bed62680a282d4c25f9c63c2efb", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm. This doesn't really reduce the diff with Package.resolved from the last commit, as that also seems to "unnested" the whole structure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It does reduce the diff with the expected output file, which was the intention of this commit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The unnesting should have been probably part of the middle commit. I'll check that.
| @@ -57,6 +57,9 @@ project: | |||
| - id: "Swift::github.com/apple/swift-atomics:1.2.0" | |||
| - id: "Swift::github.com/apple/swift-collections:1.1.0" | |||
| - id: "Swift::github.com/apple/swift-system:1.2.1" | |||
| - id: "Swift::github.com/oss-review-toolkit/ort:690a5087534c202b395d65f3262f52c98251c647" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this a Git commit SHA1 that needs to be "templatized"?
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| "version": 1 | ||
| "pins" : [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
See my comment on the first commit, the diff is still large due to the "unnesting" of "object" (and different order of pins).
| @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ | |||
| * License-Filename: LICENSE | |||
| */ | |||
|
|
|||
| @file:Suppress("TooManyFunctions") | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nit: Maybe start to move out extension functions to a separate file in a follow-up commit?
See individual commits.
Fixes #8194.