Skip to content

Let's improve the docs! #385

Description

@aeneasr

It's awesome to see how Hydra is attracting more and more users, and that we're seeing production deployments pop up! We are really close to releasing the 1.0.0 version (officially stable) as we are observing a steadily declining bug report frequency.

One large issue still open is the documentation. OAuth2 can be very overwhelming and the consent flow is an additional complexity people have to understand. The policy concept adds another mandatory "you have to understand this".

I would like to ask you, the community, what problems you faced when you first read the docs. Maybe you have ideas to improve that? Or better examples?

You could even create a PR - the docs are here. To run them, do:

npm i -g gitbook-cli
gitbook serve -http

To do

  • document all special scopes (offline, hydra, openid)
  • example with force-consent scope (maybe @waynerobinson could help here)
  • write walkthrough for GKE
  • document groups

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    help wantedWe are looking for help on this one.

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions