Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Crossing refactoring #1201

Open
wants to merge 26 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

tordans
Copy link
Collaborator

@tordans tordans commented Apr 24, 2024

This is a first follow up to the community meeting 2024-02-28 where we discussed how to improve the crossing presets.

  • The commits in this PR are mostly refactoring by streamlining the presets to use @template fields lists. Each commit message documents possible side effects.
  • The PR also adds unsearchable crossings for highway=path+path=crossing, which is missing is missing ATM.
  • The PR makes a few decision on which fields to display when. For example lit is displayed on all way type crossings. But tactile_paving is only part of the node crossings (and should be tagged on the barrier=kerb when separate ways are mapped)

Testing

Show testcases and testing log

node presets/highway/crossing.json

testing

highway=crossing

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];node["highway"="crossing"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

node/8677399770

==> All good

node presets/highway/crossing/_marked.json

highway=crossing
crossing=marked

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];node["highway"="crossing"]["crossing"="marked"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

node/7896056627

=> All good

addTags => shows yellow box

    "tags": {
        "highway": "crossing",
        "crossing": "marked"
    },

node presets/highway/crossing/_zebra.json

highway=crossing
crossing=zebra

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];node["highway"="crossing"]["crossing"="zebra"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

node/9446412638

=> All good

node presets/highway/crossing/traffic_signals.json

highway=crossing
crossing=traffic_signals

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];node["highway"="crossing"]["crossing"="traffic_signals"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

node/7242739087

=> All good

node presets/highway/crossing/uncontrolled.json

highway=crossing
crossing=uncontrolled

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];node["highway"="crossing"]["crossing"="uncontrolled"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

node/9435519215

=> All good

node presets/highway/crossing/unmarked.json

highway=crossing
crossing=unmarked

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];node["highway"="crossing"]["crossing"="unmarked"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

node/2289508839

=> All good

addTags => Works as expected

    "addTags": {
        "highway": "crossing",
        "crossing": "unmarked",
        "crossing:markings": "no"
    },

way presets/highway/cycleway/_crossing.json

cycleway=crossing

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];way["cycleway"="crossing"]["crossing"!~".*"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

way/1014361250

=> All good

addTags => All good

    "addTags": {
        "highway": "cycleway",
        "cycleway": "crossing"
    },

way presets/highway/cycleway/crossing/_marked.json

highway=cycleway
cycleway=crossing
crossing=marked

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];way["highway"="cycleway"]["cycleway"="crossing"]["crossing"="marked"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

way/1009387182

=> All good

addTags => All good

    "addTags": {
        "highway": "cycleway",
        "cycleway": "crossing",
        "crossing": "marked",
        "crossing:markings": "yes"
    },

way presets/highway/cycleway/crossing/bicycle_foot.json

"exclude": ["fr","lt","pl","il","ps"]
highway=cycleway
cycleway=crossing
foot=designated

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];way["highway"="cycleway"]["cycleway"="crossing"]["foot"="designated"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

way/1015325150

=> All good

addTags => All good

    "addTags": {
        "highway": "cycleway",
        "cycleway": "crossing",
        "foot": "designated",
        "bicycle": "designated"
    },

way presets/highway/cycleway/crossing/traffic_signals.json

highway=cycleway
cycleway=crossing
crossing=traffic_signals

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];way["highway"="cycleway"]["cycleway"="crossing"]["crossing"="traffic_signals"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

way/1189207983

=> All good

way presets/highway/cycleway/crossing/uncontrolled.json

highway=cycleway
cycleway=crossing
crossing=uncontrolled

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];way["highway"="cycleway"]["cycleway"="crossing"]["crossing"="uncontrolled"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

way/1197740324

=> All good

way presets/highway/cycleway/crossing/unmarked.json

highway=cycleway
cycleway=crossing
crossing=unmarked

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];way["highway"="cycleway"]["cycleway"="crossing"]["crossing"="unmarked"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

way/1225892530

=> All good

addTags => All good

    "addTags": {
        "highway": "cycleway",
        "cycleway": "crossing",
        "crossing": "unmarked",
        "crossing:markings": "no"
    },

way presets/highway/footway/crossing.json

highway=footway
footway=crossing

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];way["highway"="footway"]["footway"="crossing"]["crossing"!~".*"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

way/895119395

=> All good

way presets/highway/footway/crossing/_marked.json

highway=footway
footway=crossing
crossing=marked

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];way["highway"="footway"]["footway"="crossing"]["crossing"="marked"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

way/887712501

=> All good

addTags => All good (cannot handle crossing_ref=zebra from this way, but that is expected)

    "addTags": {
        "highway": "footway",
        "footway": "crossing",
        "crossing": "marked",
        "crossing:markings": "yes"
    },

way presets/highway/footway/crossing/_zebra.json

highway=footway
footway=crossing
crossing=zebra

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];way["highway"="footway"]["footway"="crossing"]["crossing"="zebra"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

way/578831990

=> All good

way presets/highway/footway/crossing/traffic_signals.json

highway=footway
footway=crossing
crossing=traffic_signals

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];way["highway"="footway"]["footway"="crossing"]["crossing"="traffic_signals"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

way/1227311404

=> All good

way presets/highway/footway/crossing/uncontrolled.json

highway=footway
footway=crossing
crossing=uncontrolled

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];way["highway"="footway"]["footway"="crossing"]["crossing"="uncontrolled"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

way/1165352272

=> ALl good

way presets/highway/footway/crossing/unmarked.json

highway=footway
footway=crossing
crossing=unmarked

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];way["highway"="footway"]["footway"="crossing"]["crossing"="unmarked"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

way/1026900725

=> All good

addTags => All good

    "addTags": {
        "highway": "footway",
        "footway": "crossing",
        "crossing": "unmarked",
        "crossing:markings": "no"
    },

way presets/highway/path/_crossing.json

highway=path
path=crossing

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];way["highway"="path"]["path"="crossing"]["crossing"!~".*"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

way/947039863

=> All good

way presets/highway/path/crossing/_marked.json

highway=path
path=crossing
crossing=marked

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];way["highway"="path"]["path"="crossing"]["crossing"="marked"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

way/1252788055

=> All good

way presets/highway/path/crossing/_traffic_signals.json

highway=path
path=crossing
crossing=traffic_signals

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];way["highway"="path"]["path"="crossing"]["crossing"="traffic_signals"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

way/1122016511

=> All good

way presets/highway/path/crossing/_uncontrolled.json

highway=path
path=crossing
crossing=uncontrolled

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];way["highway"="path"]["path"="crossing"]["crossing"="uncontrolled"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

way/1205470144

=> All good

way presets/highway/path/crossing/_unmarked.json

highway=path
path=crossing
crossing=unmarked

Overpass turbo query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?R&Q=[out:json][timeout:25];way["highway"="path"]["path"="crossing"]["crossing"="unmarked"]({{bbox}});out body;>;out skel qt;

testing

way/38771134

=> All good

addTags => All good

    "addTags": {
        "highway": "footway",
        "footway": "crossing",
        "crossing": "unmarked",
        "crossing:markings": "no"
    },

Follow ups

Show possible follow up task

Helper to see usage stats (per country) in combination of tags:

Terms are not used for unsearchable preset so we can remove them.
This streamlines the presets and makes it easer to review and use them.
This streamlines the crossings presets
Copy link

🍱 You can preview the tagging presets of this pull request here.

@tordans tordans force-pushed the crossing-refactoring branch 2 times, most recently from b24e74a to 8db5421 Compare April 24, 2024 19:52
This way we have the same fields in all crossing presets:
- "crossing"
- "tactile_paving"
- "crossing/island"

This change the order of things slightly for some footway, cycleway crossing where `surface` is now a bit lower, but that should not be a problem.
This streamlines the fields on all line geometry crossings.
- "oneway"
- "surface"
- "smoothness"
- "crossing_raised"
- "access"

Those fields are always the last in the list. For traffic signal those specific fields are put above. Which is also the only change for one vertex preset in this commit, to have the "crossing_raised" come after the traffic signal specific fields and so the order is the same across presets.

This will roll out the smoothness field for all crossings; it was previously only present in some. But given the importance of smoothness for accessibility I think that is OK. This commit also moves the surface (and smoothness where present) fields further down the list which reduces the priority a bit.

The biggest change in priority is the oneway-field which had the first position before and now is below the defaults- and markings-field.
This extract the three fields to be reused in all traffic_signals presets.
- "button_operated"
- "traffic_signals/sound"
- "traffic_signals/vibration"

Nothing else is changed, this is just an extraction into a template.
@tordans tordans force-pushed the crossing-refactoring branch 2 times, most recently from 1052eb6 to a5af304 Compare April 25, 2024 03:48
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
"license": "ISC",
"main": "build.js",
"scripts": {
"lint": "prettier --check data",
"lint": "prettier --check 'data/**/!(*.md)'",
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The alternative to this would be to change the prettier config to only apply the json-stringify on .json files and use regular prettier for other files.

However, our prettier config is still somewhat different from what I am used to and the resulting READM.md formatting is not great, so I think this is the better solution.

 % git diff
diff --git a/.prettierrc b/.prettierrc
index 27505a24..78e7d6df 100644
--- a/.prettierrc
+++ b/.prettierrc
@@ -1,6 +1,13 @@
 {
-    "parser": "json-stringify",
     "proseWrap": "never",
     "bracketSpacing": true,
-    "endOfLine": "lf"
+    "endOfLine": "lf",
+    "overrides": [
+        {
+            "files": "*.json",
+            "options": {
+                "parser": "json-stringify"
+            }
+        }
+    ]
 }

@tordans tordans force-pushed the crossing-refactoring branch 5 times, most recently from 7074531 to b77c741 Compare April 26, 2024 09:35
This extract the three moreFields to be reused in all traffic_signals presets.
- "traffic_signals/arrow"
- "traffic_signals/countdown"
- "traffic_signals/minimap"

For unclear reasons the cycleway/crossing/traffic_signals did not have those more fields which are now added to streamline the presets.
I added this in openstreetmap@3e5e99f an I think that was a mistake so lets remove it again.
The convention is, to tag this on the node _and_/_or_ on the separate `barrier=kerb+kerb=*` node when the path is mapped separately.
It should be part of all crossing vertex presets.
All those fields used a different order of properties, which made it hard to compare them.

This commit does not change anything on the fields, it just streamlines the same order of properties across files.
…tion

Using the preset I find the markings field to be the most important to change. The `@templates/crossing/defaults` is less important for all situation except for `data/presets/highway/crossing.json`. The main reasons for this is, that only on the base `highway/crossing` the field `crossing` is actually visible. For the more precise presets this field is hidden by some automatic part of the system.
All fields are unsearchable (for now) so we can learn how to name properly.

The names are adapted from `presets/highway/cycleway/crossing/bicycle_foot.json`.

The terms are removed because the presets are unsearchable.
…nd `@templates/crossing/defaults`

The field "crossing" is removed from the `/defaults` fields.
- it is only relevant for the geometry line because it is hidden on geometry vertex.
- but on geometry line, we want it to be on the first position of fields
- the `/defaults` fields however should be positioned below the `markings` which are more relevant for specifying the kind of crossing
- the `/defaults` fields now includes `crossing_raised` which was removed from the previous and discontinued `/geomery_line` fields template.

The new `@templates/crossing/bicycle_relevance`
- is used on all highways that have bicycle relevance which are `highway=path|cycleway` and not on `highway=footway`

For all traffic_signal presets, the order of fields is different to give the `/traffic_signal` more prominence.
The markings templates are not touched by this PR and it does seem to work without this. However, the fields are used on line and point geometries so either the `geometry` field is ignored during build or something else is happening…
…g `segregated`

The fields `oneway` and `access` are important for `highway=cycleway|path` crossings but not essential. They are more of a advanced user setup which should be visible when prev filled in but only added by users that read more about it before. They are moved to the `moreFields` for that reason.

The `segregated` is added here for the same reasons and because of it's importance for highway types that likely have bike traffic.
Ping openstreetmap#317

The `surface` and `smoothness` is extracted from the `@template` because it makes more sense to split them up in `fields` and `moreFields`. A templates adds too much abstraction in this case.
…ng notes

The field `flashing_light` was used on some of those presets. It is now more systematic.

I also kept them on the `traffic_signals` presets because those can have additional `flashing_lights` as well.
…ossings

The common practice is to tag this in the `highway=crossing` nodes and on separate `barrier=kerb` nodes but not on the crossing ways. Same as the `kerb` field.
Usually prettier can switch automatically to check Markdown and format it. However, this prettier config forces the JSON formatter for all files.
`npm run build` still works, so I don't think this is an issue.

This also removes the second run of very similar code in the prettier workflow which I think is probably a legacy redundancy that can just be deleted.

x
This fixes "crossing: New approach with …`@templates/crossing/defaults`".

We need the "crossing" field on vertex/node fields as well to allow to quickly change the preset.

SQ
…template/geometry_way_more`

The "lit" value was present on some of the presets before and is common to be applied to all kind of ways.
@tordans
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tordans commented Apr 26, 2024

@tyrasd this is ready for review. The testing part of the PR descriptions has links that make comparing the current and new setup easy.

This is quite the undertaking… but I think it looks much better now!

"value": "crossing"
},
"searchable": false,
"name": "Cycle & Foot Crossing"
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thinking about this again: Is this really the right name? It is not wrong, to describe a path as Bike+Foot infrastructure. However this wording was inspired by https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/1201/files#diff-3b8f616654b5d2845f63eb05ce32b27741d3945ad0a71e55033de12a656d8b56R48 which behaves differently from this preset because it also has the addTags part about foot+bicycle=designated.

Since the preset is unsearchable, no one would be confused by this when searching for presets.

And also, I thing that even if people do not add the explicit access keys, routers would still consider the generic path bike + foot infrastructure (which is why some regions prefer this tagging for the bike+foot-case in the first place).

So my opinion is this is OK … or can be changed in follow up PRs when other cases are added or reevaluated.

Copy link
Member

@tyrasd tyrasd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me after a first look. I'll will perform a double-check before merging

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants