Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OSDOCS-10109: adds 4.15.11 relnotes Microshift #75288

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

aravipra
Copy link
Contributor

@aravipra aravipra commented Apr 29, 2024

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-10109

Link to docs preview:
4.15.11 async release note

QE review:

  • N/A stock text, no bugs or enhancements

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Apr 29, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 29, 2024

@aravipra: This pull request references OSDOCS-10109 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-10109

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • N/A stock text, no bugs or enhancements

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 29, 2024
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

🤖 Mon Apr 29 16:47:37 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://75288--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/microshift/latest/microshift_release_notes/microshift-4-15-release-notes.html

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 29, 2024

@aravipra: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 29, 2024

@aravipra: This pull request references OSDOCS-10109 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.15

Issue:
OSDOCS-10109

Link to docs preview:
4.15.11 async release note

QE review:

  • N/A stock text, no bugs or enhancements

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@aravipra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Apr 29, 2024
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR branch/enterprise-4.15 labels Apr 29, 2024
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added this to the Continuous Release milestone Apr 29, 2024
@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

@aravipra One comment. Assuming the errata links are correct or will be updated when available, LGTM

@mburke5678 mburke5678 added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 29, 2024
@aravipra
Copy link
Contributor Author

aravipra commented May 2, 2024

PR on hold

@aravipra
Copy link
Contributor Author

aravipra commented May 2, 2024

Errata for 4.15.11 is dropped from release.

@aravipra aravipra closed this May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.15 jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants