[Proposal] Add proposal for adding progressDeadlineSeconds in CloneSet

[hantmac]

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

Add proposal for support progressDeadlineSeconds in CloneSet

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

To fix #1468

Ⅲ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅳ. Special notes for reviews

[kruise-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign zmberg for approval by writing /assign @zmberg in a comment. For more information see:The Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 47.97%. Comparing base (209d476) to head (b49c481).
Report is 14 commits behind head on master.

❗ Current head b49c481 differs from pull request most recent head 56517c7. Consider uploading reports for the commit 56517c7 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1520      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   47.82%   47.97%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files         161      162       +1     
  Lines       23395    23491      +96     
==========================================
+ Hits        11188    11270      +82     
- Misses      10993    11005      +12     
- Partials     1214     1216       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	47.97% <ø> (+0.15%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[furykerry]

cloneset support partition, so the definition of progressDeadlineSeconds may be different from deployment. If the cloneset is paused because of partition shall we still count the paused time in progress deadline ?

1. One possible redefinition of progressDeadlineSeconds is the time to reach completion OR "the paused state".
2. alternatively we only support progressDeadlineSeconds if partition is not set.
   I think we need more feedback from the community

[hantmac]

Yes, we should not count the time when cloneset is paused by the partition.
Only supporting progressDeadlineSeconds if partition is not set may be easy to implement.
More feedback is nice. Maybe we can make a vote about these two choice.