Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tune test parameters for new segmentation model. #25578

Closed

Conversation

asmorkalov
Copy link
Contributor

@asmorkalov asmorkalov commented May 13, 2024

Introduced in #25435

[==========] Running 4 tests from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 4 tests from Test_Model
[ RUN      ] Test_Model.Segmentation/0, where GetParam() = NGRAPH/CPU
/home/alexander/Projects/OpenCV/opencv-master/modules/dnn/test/test_common.impl.hpp:84: Failure
Expected: (normL1) <= (l1), actual: 0.259644 vs 0
  |ref| = 2
/home/alexander/Projects/OpenCV/opencv-master/modules/dnn/test/test_common.impl.hpp:87: Failure
Expected: (normInf) <= (lInf), actual: 7 vs 0
  |ref| = 2
[  FAILED  ] Test_Model.Segmentation/0, where GetParam() = NGRAPH/CPU (11777 ms)
[ RUN      ] Test_Model.Segmentation/1, where GetParam() = OCV/OCL
[ WARN:0@13.437] global ocl4dnn_conv_spatial.cpp:1933 loadTunedConfig OpenCV(ocl4dnn): consider to specify kernel configuration cache directory through OPENCV_OCL4DNN_CONFIG_PATH parameter.
OpenCL program build log: dnn/dummy
Status -11: CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE
-cl-no-subgroup-ifp
Error in processing command line: Don't understand command line argument "-cl-no-subgroup-ifp"!
/home/alexander/Projects/OpenCV/opencv-master/modules/dnn/test/test_common.impl.hpp:84: Failure
Expected: (normL1) <= (l1), actual: 0.259644 vs 0
  |ref| = 2
/home/alexander/Projects/OpenCV/opencv-master/modules/dnn/test/test_common.impl.hpp:87: Failure
Expected: (normInf) <= (lInf), actual: 7 vs 0
  |ref| = 2
[  FAILED  ] Test_Model.Segmentation/1, where GetParam() = OCV/OCL (2925 ms)
[ RUN      ] Test_Model.Segmentation/2, where GetParam() = OCV/OCL_FP16
/home/alexander/Projects/OpenCV/opencv-master/modules/dnn/test/test_common.impl.hpp:87: Failure
Expected: (normInf) <= (lInf), actual: 7 vs 2
  |ref| = 2
[  FAILED  ] Test_Model.Segmentation/2, where GetParam() = OCV/OCL_FP16 (1506 ms)
[ RUN      ] Test_Model.Segmentation/3, where GetParam() = OCV/CPU
/home/alexander/Projects/OpenCV/opencv-master/modules/dnn/test/test_common.impl.hpp:84: Failure
Expected: (normL1) <= (l1), actual: 0.259644 vs 0
  |ref| = 2
/home/alexander/Projects/OpenCV/opencv-master/modules/dnn/test/test_common.impl.hpp:87: Failure
Expected: (normInf) <= (lInf), actual: 7 vs 0
  |ref| = 2
[  FAILED  ] Test_Model.Segmentation/3, where GetParam() = OCV/CPU (2167 ms)
[----------] 4 tests from Test_Model (18375 ms total)

[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 4 tests from 1 test case ran. (18375 ms total)
[  PASSED  ] 0 tests.
[  FAILED  ] 4 tests, listed below:
[  FAILED  ] Test_Model.Segmentation/0, where GetParam() = NGRAPH/CPU
[  FAILED  ] Test_Model.Segmentation/1, where GetParam() = OCV/OCL
[  FAILED  ] Test_Model.Segmentation/2, where GetParam() = OCV/OCL_FP16
[  FAILED  ] Test_Model.Segmentation/3, where GetParam() = OCV/CPU

Pull Request Readiness Checklist

See details at https://github.com/opencv/opencv/wiki/How_to_contribute#making-a-good-pull-request

  • I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
  • To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on a code under GPL or another license that is incompatible with OpenCV
  • The PR is proposed to the proper branch
  • There is a reference to the original bug report and related work
  • There is accuracy test, performance test and test data in opencv_extra repository, if applicable
    Patch to opencv_extra has the same branch name.
  • The feature is well documented and sample code can be built with the project CMake

@fengyuentau
Copy link
Member

@WanliZhong Please take a look at this problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants