Illegal reflective access by com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$2 #308

CooperStansbury · 2018-06-15T18:15:52Z

robot throws illegal reflective access message when run using the following java installation on Darwin:

java 10.0.1 2018-04-17
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment 18.3 (build 10.0.1+10)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 18.3 (build 10.0.1+10, mixed mode)

My system config:

17.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 17.6.0: Tue May 8 15:22:16 PDT 2018; root:xnu-4570.61.1~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64

The full warning message below. See a similar known issue with recent activity 1133

WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred
WARNING: Illegal reflective access by com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$2 (file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar) to method java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String,byte[],int,int,java.security.ProtectionDomain)
WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$2
WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations
WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release

The message does not cause robot operation to exit, or fail to execute. I silenced the message by adding a VM option to the shell script.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

jamesaoverton · 2018-06-18T18:32:11Z

Thanks for the report. I haven't tried Java 10 yet, and I haven't encountered this before.

ROBOT does not use Guice directly, but we import OWLAPI which does. Here's a relevant OWLAPI issue: owlcs/owlapi#652

Can you tell whether the error is coming from OWLAPI (which we import) or from ROBOT proper?

CooperStansbury · 2018-06-18T19:38:01Z

Hard to tell without digging further. Added some verbose output, but am not smart enough decode....

[0.828s][info][class,load] com.sun.proxy.$Proxy18 source: __JVM_DefineClass__
[0.830s][info][class,load] jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor2 source: __JVM_DefineClass__
[0.831s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.spi.ProviderLookup source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.831s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.spi.ProviderLookup$1 source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.832s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.spi.ProvidesMethodBinding source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.832s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.ProviderMethod source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.833s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$CodeGenerationException source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.833s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.ProviderMethod$FastClassProviderMethod source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.833s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.ProviderMethod$ReflectionProviderMethod source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.833s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.Exposed source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.834s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.BytecodeGen$Visibility source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.834s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.BytecodeGen$Visibility$1 source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.834s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.BytecodeGen$Visibility$2 source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.834s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.reflect.$FastClass$Generator source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.834s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$GeneratorStrategy source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.834s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$Predicate source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.835s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$AbstractClassGenerator$Source source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.835s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.reflect.$FastClass source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.836s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$DefaultGeneratorStrategy source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.836s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.asm.$ClassVisitor source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.836s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$DebuggingClassWriter source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.837s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.asm.$ClassWriter source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.837s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.asm.$FieldVisitor source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.837s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.asm.$FieldWriter source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.838s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.asm.$AnnotationVisitor source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.838s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.asm.$AnnotationWriter source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.838s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.asm.$MethodVisitor source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.839s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.asm.$MethodWriter source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.841s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.asm.$ByteVector source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.842s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.asm.$Item source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.843s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.transform.$ClassTransformer source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.843s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ClassEmitter source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.843s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.reflect.$FastClassEmitter source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.845s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$LocalVariablesSorter source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.845s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$CodeEmitter source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.846s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ClassEmitter$2 source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.846s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ClassEmitter$3 source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.846s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ClassInfo source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.846s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ClassEmitter$1 source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.846s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ObjectSwitchCallback source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.847s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$Transformer source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.847s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ProcessSwitchCallback source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.847s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$TypeUtils source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.848s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$CollectionUtils source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.855s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$Signature source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.855s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.asm.$Type source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.856s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.asm.$Opcodes source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.857s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$Constants source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.857s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$AbstractClassGenerator$1 source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.862s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.asm.$Label source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.863s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$MethodInfo source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.863s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$CodeEmitter$State source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.864s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$LocalVariablesSorter$State source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.864s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.asm.$Frame source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.865s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$VisibilityPredicate source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.866s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.866s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$4 source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.866s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$3 source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.867s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$1 source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.867s][info][class,load] com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$2 source: file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar
[0.867s][info][class,load] java.lang.ClassFormatError source: jrt:/java.base
[0.868s][info][class,load] java.lang.AssertionStatusDirectives source: jrt:/java.base
[0.868s][info][class,load] java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject$$Lambda$37/1394940518 source: java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject
[0.868s][info][class,load] jdk.internal.module.IllegalAccessLogger$$Lambda$38/892083096 source: jdk.internal.module.IllegalAccessLogger
[0.869s][info][class,load] java.lang.invoke.LambdaForm$MH/554868511 source: java.lang.invoke.LambdaForm
[0.869s][info][class,load] jdk.internal.module.IllegalAccessLogger$$Lambda$39/1520387953 source: jdk.internal.module.IllegalAccessLogger
WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred
WARNING: Illegal reflective access by com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$2 (file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar) to method java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String,byte[],int,int,java.security.ProtectionDomain)
WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$2
WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations
WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release

Here's a section of compilation:

    756  796       4       java.util.HashMap::putVal (300 bytes)   made not entrant
    757  984       3       com.google.common.base.Preconditions::checkNotNull (18 bytes)
    757  985       3       com.google.common.base.Preconditions::checkNotNull (14 bytes)
    757  986       1       java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer::getState (5 bytes)
    758  987       3       jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe::pickPos (14 bytes)
    758  988       3       java.lang.PublicMethods$Key::hashCode (19 bytes)
    758  989       4       java.util.HashMap::putVal (300 bytes)
    758  990       3       sun.reflect.generics.visitor.Reifier::make (9 bytes)
    759  991       3       sun.reflect.generics.visitor.Reifier::<init> (10 bytes)
    759  992       1       com.google.inject.TypeLiteral::getRawType (5 bytes)
    759  993       3       com.google.common.base.Preconditions::checkArgument (18 bytes)
    759  995       3       sun.reflect.generics.parser.SignatureParser::markToCurrent (16 bytes)
    759  996       3       com.google.common.collect.Iterators$12::hasNext (13 bytes)
    759  994       1       com.google.inject.internal.ProviderMethodsModule$Signature::hashCode (5 bytes)
    760  997       1       java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline::getStreamAndOpFlags (5 bytes)
    760  998       3       java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$Head::forEach (26 bytes)
    760  999       3       java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline::sourceStageSpliterator (112 bytes)
    761 1001       3       java.lang.reflect.Method::getExceptionTypes (11 bytes)
    761 1003       3       jdk.internal.reflect.ClassFileAssembler::emitShort (24 bytes)
    761 1002       3       java.lang.PublicMethods$MethodList::<init> (10 bytes)
    761 1004       1       java.util.HashMap::size (5 bytes)
    762 1000       4       java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder::isLatin1 (19 bytes)
    762  180       3       java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder::isLatin1 (19 bytes)   made not entrant
    766 1005       3       sun.net.www.ParseUtil::match (50 bytes)
    766 1006       4       sun.net.www.ParseUtil::firstEncodeIndex (98 bytes)
    769  542       3       sun.net.www.ParseUtil::firstEncodeIndex (98 bytes)   made not entrant
    774 1007       4       java.util.HashMap::newNode (13 bytes)
    775 1008  s    3       java.lang.StringBuffer::append (13 bytes)
    777   71       3       java.util.HashMap::newNode (13 bytes)   made not entrant
    785 1009       3       java.lang.Float::isNaN (12 bytes)
    786 1010       3       jdk.internal.org.objectweb.asm.MethodWriter::visitFieldInsn (256 bytes)
    786 1014     n 0       java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle::invokeBasic(LLL)L (native)   
    787 1013       3       java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles$Lookup::lookupClassOrNull (17 bytes)
    787 1011       3       jdk.internal.org.objectweb.asm.ClassWriter::newFieldItem (77 bytes)
WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred
WARNING: Illegal reflective access by com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$2 (file:/Applications/robot/robot.jar) to method java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String,byte[],int,int,java.security.ProtectionDomain)
WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$2
WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations
WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release

jamesaoverton · 2018-06-18T19:50:11Z

Thanks. Unfortunately I can't decipher it either. 😄 Maybe it will make more sense to someone else.

I still suspect that this is a problem with OWLAPI rather than ROBOT.

beckyjackson · 2018-06-18T20:26:58Z

It's a problem with Guice. It looks like they fixed it for Guice 4.2 (google/guice@d95c8c0), but I guess OWLAPI hasn't updated? I just checked their pom.xml and it's bringing in Guice 4.1.

jamesaoverton · 2018-07-24T11:59:42Z

It looks like OWLAPI will move away from Guice:
owlcs/owlapi#775

@CooperStansbury Do you get similar errors when running Protégé 5 with Java 10?

CooperStansbury · 2018-07-24T12:31:06Z

Strangely, no. Running Protege 5.2.0 Java 10.0.1

…

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 7:59 AM James A. Overton ***@***.***> wrote: It looks like OWLAPI will move away from Guice: owlcs/owlapi#775 <owlcs/owlapi#775> @CooperStansbury <https://github.com/CooperStansbury> Do you get similar errors when running Protégé 5 with Java 10? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#308 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AiJ2Hd8mfFm3U_jPsd9-YYSThp17maJAks5uJwwvgaJpZM4Up9fH> .

-- Cooper M. Stansbury University of Michigan - Dearborn College of Engineering and Computer Science M.S. Data Science Candidate (734) 274-1053

jamesaoverton · 2018-07-24T14:12:28Z

We just tried six versions of the JDK with our continuous integration system #318. All six passed https://travis-ci.org/ontodev/robot/builds/407624154, including oraclejdk10 with Oracle Java 10.0.2 https://travis-ci.org/ontodev/robot/jobs/407624157.

@CooperStansbury Can you please try to reproduce the problem with Java 10.0.2 ?

CooperStansbury · 2018-07-24T17:47:22Z

Problem persists running 10.0.2 on Debian.

…

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:12 AM James A. Overton ***@***.***> wrote: We just tried six versions of the JDK with our continuous integration system #318 <#318>. All six passed https://travis-ci.org/ontodev/robot/builds/407624154, including oraclejdk10 with Oracle Java 10.0.2 https://travis-ci.org/ontodev/robot/jobs/407624157. @CooperStansbury <https://github.com/CooperStansbury> Can you please try to reproduce the problem with Java 10.0.2 ? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#308 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AiJ2HRjRtL5j8XiUj27aRzNy9CF0LeXCks5uJytOgaJpZM4Up9fH> .

-- Cooper M. Stansbury University of Michigan - Dearborn College of Engineering and Computer Science M.S. Data Science Candidate (734) 274-1053

jamesaoverton · 2018-07-25T11:44:46Z

Well at least we're eliminating some possibilities.

My next idea is to change ROBOT https://github.com/ontodev/robot/blob/master/pom.xml and upgrade owlapi-distribution from 4.2.6 to 4.2.8, which would match Protégé https://github.com/protegeproject/protege/blob/master/pom.xml.

@CooperStansbury If you have the time and inclination to test that, it would be very helpful. @rctauber and I are struggling with some deadlines. If not, no problem, we'll get to it as soon as we can.

CooperStansbury · 2018-07-25T14:22:55Z

Updated owlapi-distribution from 4.2.6 to 4.2.8 pom.xml locally and rebuilt with mvn. The illegal reflective access error is thrown during the tests regardless of which owlapi-distribution is chosen. I'll have time to prod around a little more next week.

…

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 7:44 AM James A. Overton ***@***.***> wrote: Well at least we're eliminating some possibilities. My next idea is to change ROBOT https://github.com/ontodev/robot/blob/master/pom.xml and upgrade owlapi-distribution from 4.2.6 to 4.2.8, which would match Protégé https://github.com/protegeproject/protege/blob/master/pom.xml. @CooperStansbury <https://github.com/CooperStansbury> If you have the time and inclination to test that, it would be very helpful. @rctauber <https://github.com/rctauber> and I are struggling with some deadlines. If not, no problem, we'll get to it as soon as we can. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#308 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AiJ2HeNGRmq1WBJ4pGqRD9hQDK68w-zAks5uKFowgaJpZM4Up9fH> .

-- Cooper M. Stansbury University of Michigan - Dearborn College of Engineering and Computer Science M.S. Data Science Candidate (734) 274-1053

jamesaoverton · 2018-07-27T12:04:13Z

The Guice dependency has been removed from OWLAPI 5.1.6 and 4.5.4.

To minimize compatibility problems, we've been trying to keep ROBOT's OWLAPI dependency in sync with the latest Protégé release. That said, I don't expect that upgrading ROBOT to 4.5.4 would cause any problems.

beckyjackson · 2019-01-30T16:31:30Z

We have updated to OWLAPI 4.5.6. If this issue persists, please re-open.

jamesaoverton mentioned this issue Jul 23, 2018

Illegal reflective access for Guice when running ROBOT under Java 10 owlcs/owlapi#775

Closed

jamesaoverton mentioned this issue Jul 31, 2018

Test against multiple Java versions #318

Closed

beckyjackson mentioned this issue Aug 15, 2018

Issue updating to OWLAPI 4.5.4 #346

Closed

beckyjackson mentioned this issue Sep 3, 2018

Update to OWLAPI 4.5.6 #355

Merged

jamesaoverton mentioned this issue Sep 4, 2018

Proposed upgrade of owlapi to 4.5.5 protegeproject/protege#798

Closed

balhoff mentioned this issue Nov 26, 2018

Added missing Meta.getDeprecated() geneontology/obographs#40

Merged

beckyjackson closed this as completed Jan 30, 2019

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Illegal reflective access by com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$2 #308

Illegal reflective access by com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$2 #308

CooperStansbury commented Jun 15, 2018

jamesaoverton commented Jun 18, 2018

CooperStansbury commented Jun 18, 2018

jamesaoverton commented Jun 18, 2018

beckyjackson commented Jun 18, 2018

jamesaoverton commented Jul 24, 2018

CooperStansbury commented Jul 24, 2018 via email

jamesaoverton commented Jul 24, 2018

CooperStansbury commented Jul 24, 2018 via email

jamesaoverton commented Jul 25, 2018

CooperStansbury commented Jul 25, 2018 via email

jamesaoverton commented Jul 27, 2018

beckyjackson commented Jan 30, 2019

Illegal reflective access by com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$2 #308

Illegal reflective access by com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$2 #308

Comments

CooperStansbury commented Jun 15, 2018

jamesaoverton commented Jun 18, 2018

CooperStansbury commented Jun 18, 2018

jamesaoverton commented Jun 18, 2018

beckyjackson commented Jun 18, 2018

jamesaoverton commented Jul 24, 2018

CooperStansbury commented Jul 24, 2018 via email

jamesaoverton commented Jul 24, 2018

CooperStansbury commented Jul 24, 2018 via email

jamesaoverton commented Jul 25, 2018

CooperStansbury commented Jul 25, 2018 via email

jamesaoverton commented Jul 27, 2018

beckyjackson commented Jan 30, 2019