New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tell Git to ignore //third_party/node-nw. #85
Open
hujiajie
wants to merge
1
commit into
nwjs:nw25
Choose a base branch
from
hujiajie:gitignore-node-nw
base: nw25
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rogerwang
force-pushed
the
nw24
branch
2 times, most recently
from
July 20, 2017 05:04
e0e7aeb
to
13bc321
Compare
We'll review this after 0.24.0 release as the PR is for nw24. Thanks. |
hujiajie
force-pushed
the
gitignore-node-nw
branch
from
July 21, 2017 04:38
5c99a0b
to
14f6696
Compare
rogerwang
force-pushed
the
nw24
branch
2 times, most recently
from
July 25, 2017 23:11
ffa178c
to
7a80b4f
Compare
hujiajie
force-pushed
the
gitignore-node-nw
branch
from
July 26, 2017 01:25
14f6696
to
0042acc
Compare
hujiajie
force-pushed
the
gitignore-node-nw
branch
from
July 26, 2017 08:19
0042acc
to
44e21d0
Compare
hujiajie
force-pushed
the
gitignore-node-nw
branch
from
July 27, 2017 05:18
44e21d0
to
00b4843
Compare
hujiajie
force-pushed
the
gitignore-node-nw
branch
from
July 31, 2017 04:02
00b4843
to
20c4223
Compare
@rogerwang, please take a look, thanks! |
GnorTech
force-pushed
the
nw24
branch
3 times, most recently
from
August 3, 2017 09:18
da91293
to
9a7251d
Compare
GnorTech
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 5, 2017
Resize spinner, standardize color use, add learn more to error state, change reboot required icon Also makes chrome://settings/help use the right colors. Bug: 747124 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.linux:closure_compilation Change-Id: Ifae6b61cc4ffa668dbe095333f3590a2d97277a4 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/580360 Reviewed-by: Tommy Li <tommycli@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: proberge <proberge@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#488992} (cherry picked from commit 435ed18) Change-Id: I6f20ec0a45aec8f19e4df42921a994567576c7d9 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/590349 Reviewed-by: proberge <proberge@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/3163@{#85} Cr-Branched-From: ff259ba-refs/heads/master@{#488528}
hujiajie
force-pushed
the
gitignore-node-nw
branch
from
August 9, 2017 08:17
20c4223
to
1789ff0
Compare
rogerwang
force-pushed
the
nw24
branch
4 times, most recently
from
August 18, 2017 06:36
1ca1e3c
to
b8e7aeb
Compare
rogerwang
force-pushed
the
nw24
branch
2 times, most recently
from
August 25, 2017 01:20
e2db204
to
788ef9a
Compare
hujiajie
force-pushed
the
gitignore-node-nw
branch
from
September 1, 2017 07:01
1789ff0
to
b195672
Compare
Please consider to review this one line change at your convenience. Thanks! |
GnorTech
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2017
setRemoteDescription() ("SRD") is executed on the main thread, does work on the webrtc signaling thread which has callbacks that jump back to the main thread to fire events and resolve the promise. The callback on the main thread needs to know about the stream, tracks and their receivers. Previously, we invoked native_peer_connection_ ->GetReceivers() in the main thread callback. This was problematic in this case: SRD that adds stream x SRD that removes stream x By the time we do GetReceivers() in the main thread callback the stream may already have been removed from the native_peer_connection_ by the second SRD call. This lead to a crash because it couldn't find the receivers of the added stream. The fix is to do the GetReceivers() call while still on the webrtc signaling thread and not do any querying of the native_peer_connection_'s state from the main thread callback. Calling SRD in succession without waiting for the promises to resolve is inherently racey but this ensures the events fire without crashing and that we end up in the correct state. The indeterminate (racey) part is whether or not the stream fired in the first ontrack/onaddstream events contain the first track or is empty. TBR=hbos@chromium.org (cherry picked from commit 545dbdf) Bug: 759324 Change-Id: Icdbf6f255a046ddf67feee2e59dab48952219184 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/647531 Reviewed-by: Guido Urdaneta <guidou@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Henrik Boström <hbos@chromium.org> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#499601} Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/657101 Reviewed-by: Henrik Boström <hbos@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/3202@{#85} Cr-Branched-From: fa6a5d8-refs/heads/master@{#499098}
hujiajie
pushed a commit
to hujiajie/chromium.src
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 14, 2017
The UMA is recorded when requestMediaKeySystemAccess is called on non-ClearKey key system but will reported at most once per renderer process. BUG=711348 TEST=Manually tested Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2824643002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#465159} (cherry picked from commit 6041683) Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2834653002 . Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/3071@{nwjs#85} Cr-Branched-From: a106f0a-refs/heads/master@{#464641}
hujiajie
force-pushed
the
gitignore-node-nw
branch
from
September 14, 2017 10:06
b195672
to
18d3306
Compare
rogerwang
force-pushed
the
nw25
branch
4 times, most recently
from
September 20, 2017 04:58
23f025b
to
498e6d7
Compare
hujiajie
force-pushed
the
gitignore-node-nw
branch
from
September 21, 2017 04:58
18d3306
to
eff5d44
Compare
rogerwang
force-pushed
the
nw25
branch
2 times, most recently
from
September 22, 2017 10:28
0b63552
to
1d17e7f
Compare
hujiajie
force-pushed
the
gitignore-node-nw
branch
from
September 25, 2017 07:42
eff5d44
to
6f42a55
Compare
rogerwang
force-pushed
the
nw25
branch
4 times, most recently
from
October 4, 2017 08:18
2f4783c
to
223521f
Compare
hujiajie
force-pushed
the
gitignore-node-nw
branch
from
October 9, 2017 08:07
6f42a55
to
6f74165
Compare
GnorTech
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2017
…roller" This reverts commit 24e5c55. Bug: 774681 Change-Id: I2624c46835a32d60a7361077b3bbe20939faa307 TBR: kinuko Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/728879 Reviewed-by: Matt Falkenhagen <falken@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/3239@{#85} Cr-Branched-From: adb61db-refs/heads/master@{#508578}
rogerwang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2018
TBR=dimu@chromium.org Change-Id: Ifad61ab729a7f93913e0a668ef53a994aa723c1c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/885302 Reviewed-by: chrome-release-bot@chromium.org <chrome-release-bot@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/3325@{#85} Cr-Branched-From: bc084a8-refs/heads/master@{#530369}
GnorTech
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2018
TBR=jialiul@chromium.org (cherry picked from commit d80964d) Bug: 818559 Change-Id: I81db22fded6d75fe74098177fc8eecd4f0ffcbec Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/948069 Commit-Queue: Jialiu Lin <jialiul@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Scott Violet <sky@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Varun Khaneja <vakh@chromium.org> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#541076} Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/954609 Reviewed-by: Jialiu Lin <jialiul@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/3359@{#85} Cr-Branched-From: 66afc5e-refs/heads/master@{#540276}
rogerwang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2018
Race condition introduced in: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/724724 The crash is caused by a race condition, where the the renderer attempted to register another PresentationController to PresentationServiceImpl while there is still a (soon-to-be invalid) one already. When we moved the PresentationController implementation from PresentationDispatcher to blink::PresentationController, we are now creating/destoying the PresentationController across navigation (instead of having it long-lived in the PresentationDispatcher / RenderFrameImpl). The fix is to close all message pipes / Reset() in PresentationServiceImpl when a Mojo connection error is detected. This way, the PresentationServiceImpl will be in a clean state when the renderer connects to it again. This also fixes PresentationReceiver's behavior of obtaining a connection to PresentationService and immediately dropping it after calling SetReceiver(), which would let to Reset() getting called with this patch. To merge back to 66 (if possible) and 67. Bug: 832176 Change-Id: Ic7cd2601a107024143936fa9e1ae197505e4cf64 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1011289 Reviewed-by: mark a. foltz <mfoltz@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Derek Cheng <imcheng@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Derek Cheng <imcheng@chromium.org> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#551057}(cherry picked from commit 1ad7724) Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1017319 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/3396@{#85} Cr-Branched-From: 9ef2aa8-refs/heads/master@{#550428}
rogerwang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2018
This CL reverts commit a6a203c. (crrev.com/c/729220) We'll leave these feature detection API disabled in canary and dev channel to gather some feedback. But don't let it in Beta and Stable channel because it breaks embed map. This revert will merge into into M68, but not landed in master branch Bug: 804890 Change-Id: Ib017006081baf12b69fe137ba9aeae915b5274a3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1081874 Reviewed-by: Ella Ge <eirage@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/3440@{#85} Cr-Branched-From: 010ddcf-refs/heads/master@{#561733}
GnorTech
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 4, 2018
This CL add a feature parameter to the Proactive Tab Discarding and Freezing experiment to prevent discarding tabs that share their browsing instance with another tab. This might be too agressive, in practice we might just want to consider tabs under the same SiteInstance but this is not an information that we can access yet. Check this page for more details about the SiteInstance/BrowsingInstance concepts: https://www.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/process-models#Implementation_Notes UKM privacy document has been updated here (pending approval): https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/1BNQ5nLOtPuwP7oxr9r-XKNKr5iObXEiA_69WXAvuYAo/edit?disco=AAAABzM-vE0 Bug: 775644, 862203 Change-Id: Iaf5107db1d68aa4a0155ecbae7283f487c23bb7c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1144188 Commit-Queue: Sébastien Marchand <sebmarchand@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Chris Hamilton <chrisha@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Alexei Svitkine <asvitkine@chromium.org> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#576789}(cherry picked from commit 94d6d39) Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1150261 Reviewed-by: Sébastien Marchand <sebmarchand@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/3497@{#85} Cr-Branched-From: 271eaf5-refs/heads/master@{#576753}
rogerwang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2018
…nified_consent. Unified Consent feature is no longer dependent on Desktop Identity Consistency being enabled. This means that the Unified Consent feature is no longer a per-profile feature. This CL removes the argument profile from IsUnifiedConsentFeatureEnabled and IsUnifiedConsentFeatureWithBumpEnabled and moves these functions in the unified consent component. Bug: 873064 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:ios-simulator-cronet;luci.chromium.try:ios-simulator-full-configs Change-Id: Ifc338dbcb48500bc17d52bf5bcf52a45ea46860d Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1202702 Commit-Queue: Mihai Sardarescu <msarda@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Steven Holte <holte@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jochen Eisinger <jochen@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: David Roger <droger@chromium.org> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#588891} Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1209362 Reviewed-by: Mihai Sardarescu <msarda@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/3538@{#85} Cr-Branched-From: 79f7c91-refs/heads/master@{#587811}
rogerwang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2018
Bug: 881664 Change-Id: If8bc6ea2368c32a4a76d474ed625a0db5da0492d Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1279426 Reviewed-by: Kyle Horimoto <khorimoto@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jeremy Klein <jlklein@chromium.org> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#599792}(cherry picked from commit bbe547a) Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1286874 Reviewed-by: Jeremy Klein <jlklein@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/3578@{#85} Cr-Branched-From: 4226ddf-refs/heads/master@{#599034}
rogerwang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2018
Previously, we always returned true for "is mapped rect non- empty?" from LocalToAncestorVisualRect in the presence of effect nodes which may move pixels. Now return true only if the actual computed rect is non-empty. Bug:910741 TBR=chrishtr@chromium.org (cherry picked from commit 5aeac68) Change-Id: I41935060706b887f58ed14a179d8975bee02c39f Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1359692 Reviewed-by: Xianzhu Wang <wangxianzhu@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Chris Harrelson <chrishtr@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Chris Harrelson <chrishtr@chromium.org> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#613625} Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1363954 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/3626@{#85} Cr-Branched-From: d897fb1-refs/heads/master@{#612437}
rogerwang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2019
Enable the feature by default, but with a FeatureList kill-switch. Bug: 570205 Change-Id: I003c21871ab71e47a863707b9709a39d76883635 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1429820 Reviewed-by: Karan Bhatia <karandeepb@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Kunihiko Sakamoto <ksakamoto@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Kinuko Yasuda <kinuko@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Takashi Toyoshima <toyoshim@chromium.org> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#626969}(cherry picked from commit 67bee39) Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1446263 Reviewed-by: Takashi Toyoshima <toyoshim@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/3683@{#85} Cr-Branched-From: e510299-refs/heads/master@{#625896}
rogerwang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2019
…oadcastingReceiver In the recently added class BroadcastingReceiver for enabling multi-client access to video capture devices, see design doc [1], an assumption was made that producers never retire buffers while they are still in use. Even though this assumption may have held at some point during development, a test failure at a CL [2] that moves the service to the browser process on ChromeOS revealed that it no longer holds. This CL removes this assumption and adds correct handling of the case. [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mYnsZfLBRmbsDpUtfb6C7dzhfw2Kcxg_-uiG_6MnWVQ/edit?usp=sharing [2] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1506604/1 test: services_unittests --gtest_filter=BroadcastingReceiverTest.* test: services_unittests --gtest_filter=MockVideoCaptureDeviceSharedAccessTest.* test: content_browsertests --gtest_filter=WebRtcVideoCaptureServiceBrowserTest.* Bug: 783442, 939587 Change-Id: I9d27c69386e76c2ea472f8549721fa5cf890ae61 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1509902 Reviewed-by: Robert Sesek <rsesek@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Emircan Uysaler <emircan@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Christian Fremerey <chfremer@chromium.org> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#639747}(cherry picked from commit ce0b05d2aa49a6b22c1033c4d1081a3d923248a7) Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1520348 Reviewed-by: Christian Fremerey <chfremer@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/3729@{#85} Cr-Branched-From: d4a8972-refs/heads/master@{#638880}
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.