Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: node.js debugger adds stderr (but exit code is 0) -> shouldn't throw #2719

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Aug 22, 2022
Merged

fix: node.js debugger adds stderr (but exit code is 0) -> shouldn't throw #2719

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
93df27b
fix: node.js debugger adds stderr (but exit code is 0) -> shouldn't t…
FuPeiJiang Aug 19, 2022
c3e909d
input.py: subprocess.Popen() -> subprocess.run()
FuPeiJiang Aug 19, 2022
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion gyp/pylib/gyp/input.py
View file
Open in desktop
Expand Up @@ -979,8 +979,9 @@ def ExpandVariables(input, phase, variables, build_file):
p_stdout = p_stdout.decode("utf-8")
p_stderr = p_stderr.decode("utf-8")

if p.wait() != 0 or p_stderr:
if p_stderr:
sys.stderr.write(p_stderr)
if p.wait() != 0:
# Simulate check_call behavior, since check_call only exists
# in python 2.5 and later.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
# Simulate check_call behavior, since check_call only exists
# in python 2.5 and later.

Remove.

raise GypError(
Expand Down