We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NLTK has plenty of abstract base classes. Now that Python has support for these, we need to audit the codebase and adopt this syntax.
cf https://docs.python.org/3.0/whatsnew/2.6.html#pep-3119
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks @mrecachinas and @kmike for #1223. It looks like we have a model that can be applied across the toolkit now.
Sorry, something went wrong.
@stevenbird Is the issue fixed?
@stevenbird it seems that this issue has been fixed, it might be useful to close it.
Thanks @souravsingh, @gmotzespina!
No branches or pull requests
NLTK has plenty of abstract base classes. Now that Python has support for these, we need to audit the codebase and adopt this syntax.
cf https://docs.python.org/3.0/whatsnew/2.6.html#pep-3119
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: