[MAINT] test on several macos versions

[Remi-Gau]

• Closes none but relates to Failures of some tests for load_confounds on mac OS 14 #4404

Changes proposed in this pull request:

• test on macos 14 with latest dependencies to monitor failures seen in Failures of some tests for load_confounds on mac OS 14 #4404
• test on macos 13 to make sure tests pass as usual

[github-actions]

👋 @Remi-Gau Thanks for creating a PR!

Until this PR is ready for review, you can include the [WIP] tag in its title, or leave it as a github draft.

Please make sure it is compliant with our contributing guidelines. In particular, be sure it checks the boxes listed below.

• PR has an interpretable title.
• PR links to Github issue with mention Closes #XXXX (see our documentation on PR structure)
• Code is PEP8-compliant (see our documentation on coding style)
• Changelog or what's new entry in doc/changes/latest.rst (see our documentation on PR structure)

For new features:

• There is at least one unit test per new function / class (see our documentation on testing)
• The new feature is demoed in at least one relevant example.

For bug fixes:

• There is at least one test that would fail under the original bug conditions.

We will review it as quick as possible, feel free to ping us with questions if needed.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.02%. Comparing base (abb80ff) to head (aada3c1).
Report is 66 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4405      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.85%   92.02%   +0.17%     
==========================================
  Files         144      143       -1     
  Lines       16419    16634     +215     
  Branches     3434     3528      +94     
==========================================
+ Hits        15082    15308     +226     
+ Misses        792      758      -34     
- Partials      545      568      +23     

Flag	Coverage Δ
macos-13_3.11_test_plotting	91.81% <ø> (?)
macos-13_3.8_test_plotting	91.77% <ø> (?)
macos-latest_3.11_test_plotting	?
ubuntu-latest_3.10_test_plotting	91.81% <ø> (-0.05%)	⬇️
ubuntu-latest_3.11_test_plotting	91.81% <ø> (?)
ubuntu-latest_3.12_test_plotting	91.81% <ø> (?)
ubuntu-latest_3.12_test_pre	91.81% <ø> (?)
ubuntu-latest_3.8_test_min	68.71% <ø> (?)
ubuntu-latest_3.8_test_plot_min	91.47% <ø> (?)
ubuntu-latest_3.8_test_plotting	91.77% <ø> (?)
ubuntu-latest_3.9_test_plotting	91.77% <ø> (?)
windows-latest_3.10_test_plotting	91.78% <ø> (?)
windows-latest_3.11_test_plotting	91.78% <ø> (?)
windows-latest_3.12_test_plotting	91.78% <ø> (?)
windows-latest_3.8_test_plotting	91.74% <ø> (?)
windows-latest_3.9_test_plotting	91.75% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[bthirion]

Maybe add a note, in case we forget updating that ?
LGTM otherwise

[man-shu]

LGTM!

[Remi-Gau]

Maybe add a note, in case we forget updating that ?

I am not going to close the issue after merging, so unlikely we forget.