feat: refactoring and extending the support of validation property assignments #2742
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Fawzi Abdulfattah <iifawzie@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Fawzi Abdulfattah <iifawzie@gmail.com>
|
Hi, are there any updates on this? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Only a limited number of decorators are supported, and are listed directly in the model-class visitor.
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
1- Extended it to support the following decorators:
2- After adding these decorators the file became too long and hard to read, that's why I thought of refactoring it to separate the concerns and isolate the facts ( decorators to properties mappings ) so it's not flooding the visitor, and easier to read and maintain.
If you think this refactor is unnecessary or anything could be improved, let me know.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information