-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
front: Added on option to use audio-sles plugin
- Loading branch information
Gillou68310
committed
Apr 27, 2015
1 parent
bd43e6b
commit ee01293
Showing
4 changed files
with
7 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ee01293
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Gillou68310
This is working great on my Nexus 7! I can't believe you just wrote a new audio plugin while no one was looking :P
What are your long term plans for this? Do you plan to push it upstream and maintain it there, or just keep it as an android-only plugin (like video-gln64)? What are the TODOs before merging it to master?
You probably saw this discussion already, but FWIW I'll mention it again:
mupen64plus/mupen64plus-core#79
It would seem like this new audio-sles plugin would be a better starting point than audio-sdl if we were to use the @bsmiles32 new backend audio API. What are your thoughts?
Thanks again!
ee01293
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's probably because I started working on it on monday :P
I don't think upstream devs will be interested in this plugin so I guess we can maintain it downstream.
I just made a new commit to the sles branch which adds support for resampling, config parameters and dynamic buffer allocation. I still need to add the config parameters to the GUI. If there's no regression compared to the last version then we can merge it to master.
If the sles plugin is prouved to be better than the sdl plugin in all situations, is there any reason to keep it downstream?
ee01293
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably not. At the very least audio-sles would be the new default. Might be good to retain audio-sdl for a while though for regression tests (particularly if the upstream audio plugin api is getting refactored/obsoleted).
ee01293
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree ;-)