Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Windows compatibility #417

Open
wants to merge 69 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aristizabal95
Copy link
Contributor

CThis PR applies the necessary changes to provide support for Windows machines. It does so by adjusting requirements, updating the MLCube packages, and providing additional logic if necessary. Closes #363.

@aristizabal95 aristizabal95 added this to the 2023 Q1 (v1.0.0) milestone Apr 19, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 19, 2023

MLCommons CLA bot All contributors have signed the MLCommons CLA ✍️ ✅

@@ -1,18 +1,20 @@
typer~=0.6.0
typer~=0.6.0; sys_platform != "win32"
typer<0.5.0; sys_platform == "win32"
rich~=12.5.0
PyYAML>=5.4,<6
requests>=2.26.0
pydantic==1.10.2
yaspin==2.1.0
tabulate==0.8.9
pexpect==4.8.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need this for windows?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

here I meant to refer to pexpect

Copy link
Contributor

@hasan7n hasan7n left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work Alejandro, thanks! A couple of points:

  1. Let's add Windows OS for the workflow runner configuration. Do we need to contact administrators about this before?
  2. Since singularity is not supported in Windows, do we have an informative message when someone tries to use --platform singularity on Windows?
  3. I am a bit concerned about using wexpect. pexpect mentions it but says that it is unmaintained. I wonder if we can later see an alternative (even maybe an alternative to pexpect?)

aristizabal95 and others added 2 commits April 25, 2023 10:27
Co-authored-by: hasan7n <78664424+hasan7n@users.noreply.github.com>
@hasan7n
Copy link
Contributor

hasan7n commented May 8, 2023

the only todo: workflow for windows

@hasan7n hasan7n requested a review from a team as a code owner August 20, 2023 22:26
@hasan7n hasan7n had a problem deploying to testing-external-code August 20, 2023 22:26 — with GitHub Actions Failure
@hasan7n hasan7n had a problem deploying to testing-external-code August 20, 2023 22:29 — with GitHub Actions Failure
@hasan7n hasan7n had a problem deploying to testing-external-code August 21, 2023 01:05 — with GitHub Actions Failure
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Windows Support
2 participants