Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal - HTML Document Querying (Independent Publisher) #3478

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

remyblok
Copy link


When submitting a connector, please make sure that you follow the requirements below, otherwise your PR might be rejected. We want to make you have a well-built connector, a smooth certification experience, and your users are happy :)

If this is your first time submitting to GitHub and you need some help, please sign up for this session.

  • I attest that the connector doesn't exist on the Power Platform today. I've verified by checking the pull requests in GitHub and by searching for the connector on the platform or in the documentation.
  • I attest that the connector works and I verified by deploying and testing all the operations.
  • I attest that I have added detailed descriptions for all operations and parameters in the swagger file.
  • I attest that I have added response schemas to my actions, unless the response schema is dynamic.
  • I validated the swagger file, apiDefinition.swagger.json, by running paconn validate command.
  • If this is a certified connector, I confirm that apiProperties.json has a valid brand color and doesn't use an invalid brand color, #007ee5 or #ffffff. If this is an independent publisher connector, I confirm that I am not submitting a connector icon.

If you are an Independent Publisher, you must also attest to the following to ensure a smooth publishing process:

  • I have named this PR after the pattern of "Connector Name (Independent Publisher)" ex: HubSpot Marketing (Independent Publisher)
  • Within this PR markdown file, I have pasted screenshots that show: 3 unique operations (actions/triggers) working within a Flow. This can be in one flow or part of multiple flows. For each one of those flows, I have pasted in screenshots of the Flow succeeding.
  • Within this PR markdown file, I have pasted in a screenshot from the Test operations section within the Custom Connector UI.
  • If the connector uses OAuth, I have provided detailed steps on how to create an app in the readme.md.

@troystaylor
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Remy, Please be aware of the limited namespaces allowed by Microsoft:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/connectors/custom-connectors/write-code#supported-namespaces

@remyblok
Copy link
Author

Hi Troy, I had that list interpreted as "these namespaces are imported globally". My code works as custom connector, including the required additional namespaces. So the list seems not be be exclusive... Do you know if the custom connector will be rejected because of this? Thanks for your support :)

@troystaylor
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Remy, Previous connectors that have been submitted were rejected. However, with Build next week, you may have discovered an unannounced feature.
@vmanoharas Can we get confirmation from the connector team?

@vmanoharas
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @remyblok, As @troystaylor mentioned the namespaces are supported only mentioned in the url by him. Kindly update your script, it will reject during verification/deployment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants