Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

plans for supporting fungi #719

Open
jotech opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

plans for supporting fungi #719

jotech opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@jotech
Copy link
Contributor

jotech commented Apr 23, 2024

Is there a current plan to include other microorganisms like fungi?

It would most probably involve other tools and databases, but at least for the assembly, spades could work, too.

Is there a way to start from, e.g., avoid filtering before binning?

I found some references from older issues and milestones:
#356
https://github.com/metagenome-atlas/atlas/milestone/4

@SilasK
Copy link
Member

SilasK commented Apr 29, 2024

No plans. I would like to make a small rehaul of the pipeline first. Yes, I think assembly, and binning with vamb should you also give Fungi genomes. Should be unbiased. E.g. other binners use single-copy markers of bacteria.

What you can to today:

You can check if there are big bins with very bad checkM quality scores, after atlas run binning. I could add Busco quality checking.

Limitations

I am not sure how feasible it will be to get a MAG from fungi. Do you have data where this could be possible?
I guess that getting quantification with reference genomes would be better. Wha do you think?

@SilasK SilasK added this to the Eukaryotes milestone Apr 29, 2024
@jotech
Copy link
Contributor Author

jotech commented May 4, 2024

hi @SilasK, many thanks for your reply!

I checked the bigger bins with low-quality scores, and I found some fungi contigs, but the bins seem rather very much chimeric or contaminated (full of everything: fungi, bacteria, metazoa, phages)

In principle, it should be possible to find fungi using the dataset I have. It consists of compost samples, and I also have 16S and ITS data that indicate that many bacteria and fungi are present.

Getting quantification with reference genomes or markers might be an alternative I agree. I'm only wondering if some fungi genes or genomes could be recovered from the data

@SilasK
Copy link
Member

SilasK commented May 6, 2024

On gene and even contig level. Analysis should be definitively working. But I fear MAG/Bin level not.

For example, the Atlas genecatalog should contain most of the fungi genes. The eggNOG annotation also specifies if a gene annotation is from mungi. Check this.

Next step, that tI should implement is a larger taxonomic quantification of genes using mmseqs.

@jotech
Copy link
Contributor Author

jotech commented May 6, 2024

good idea; I will investigate the contig and gene level!

I have tried taxonomic profiling mmseqs2 so far and found fungi genes in the genecatalog fasta, which is good news.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants