Updated discord blockquote syntax #180
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Discord's syntax for single line blockquotes is a single
>, as opposed to the>>>in this page, followed by a space, then any text until the end of the line.As stated in Discord's Markdown article,
>>>renders the rest of the message as a codeblock. This is less useful in my opinion than just a single line blockquote with>, as most of the time it's not really wanted for the entire rest of the message to be a blockquote, instead of one or more lines each prefixed with a>.Because of this, I think the syntax specified should just note the single line blockquotes and could include the ability to use
>>>, although this might be pushing it with the length of the note.