Support Django 2.0

[jasperlittle]

This pull request aims to provide support for all supported versions of Django and Djano REST Framework.(affecting #175). The support now offered is summarised in the table below:

	DRF 3.4	DRF 3.5	DRF 3.6	DRF 3.7
Django 1.10	x	x	x	x
Django 1.11	x	x	x	x
Django 2.0				python 3.4+

where 'x' indicates support for python 2.7, 3.4, 3.5 and 3.6.

Support has dropped for Django 1.8 and 1.9, as well as python 3.2 and 3.3. I believe this is for the best, as Django 1.9 and below are considered insecure, and python 3.2 and 3.3 are not supported from Django
1.9 onwards.

Compatibility between Django 1.x and 2.x is achieved by adding a compatibility layer, in a similar manner to that of Django REST Framework

Testing for the various supported configurations is done using tox.

[jasperlittle]

Oops, I wasn't familiar with the Travis CI process. Final 2 commits should have fixed that

[rfezzani]

I tested it, works fine! Thank you for this contribution. Hope that it will be merged soon.

[psyonara]

Thank you, @jasperlittle!

[yizhang7210]

Thank you @jasperlittle!!!

[psyonara]

Technically, Django 1.8 still has extended support, but this is only until 1 April. And besides we have a much newer LTS in Django 1.11, so dropping 1.8 is a good decision IMO.

[deadpyxel]

Is there any prevision for merge?

[whitedogg13]

Also watching this. Really hope this great lib can carry on!

[niknokseyer]

Hope this get to be a part of a release.

[TheBlackDude]

Thanks @jasperlittle

[TheBlackDude]

Any ideas when this PR is going to be merged @manosim ???

[manosim]

Hello there! Have given push access to @jasperlittle so he can merge and release 😄

[cwirz]

Have tested it and get some regex problems in the template so that the user is not able to test the api there:

[deadpyxel]

Does anyone have the status about this pull request? I see that some regex problems appeared, but is anyone working on a fix?

[whitedogg13]

Hi guys, I just created a new lib supporting Django 1.x and 2.x: django-rest-framework-redocs.

It's also a zero configuration automatic API doc page generator, please take a look and help me make it better!

[gracegrimwood]

Is this still a thing?

[deadpyxel]

I believe so, but I'm not sure if someone is working on a fix for the reg-ex problem. I am a newbie myself, so I'm not sure if I can really help.

[iamhssingh]

Will love to contribute @jasperlittle @manosim

Keep this alive. been using this for a long time!

[othreecodes]

merge?

[kevincianfarini]

Is there anything else that needs to be done for this to be merged?

[liaodalin19903]

@jasperlittle @manosim Hi, friends, can you give the merge access to me? I don't why there still not merge the branch.

[ggjersund]

Waiting for this merge as well.
I really need a working, interactive API that supports tokens, as browsable API does not.

[novarac23]

+1 on this 😬

[mago960806]

@cwirz I just fixed it.
filename: rest_framework_docs\api_endpoint.py
line26: self.name_parent = simplify_regex(parent_regex).strip('/').replace('\','') if parent_regex else None
line42: return "/{0}{1}".format(self.name_parent, simplify_regex(regex).replace('\',''))

[live-wire]

Any ETA on merging and releasing this ?

[othreecodes]

@jasperlittle @manosim updates?

[inoyatov]

How I can use it? Should I install from source?

[efazati]

👍

[daspecster]

👍

[iamhssingh]

@jasperlittle Can you push and merge? You have the access.

@manosim What about pypi? Can @jasperlittle also update on pypi?

[merwok]

I think this will cause 1.11.0 to be installed, not any 1.11.*

[calina-c]

updates on this?

[espoirMur]

@newsuk any update on this?