Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

An (incorrect) implementation for symbolic strong bisimulation #1736

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mlaveaux
Copy link
Member

This pull request is mostly a reminder to keep this branch alive and perhaps re-implement it after integrating OxiDD. Also to list the remaining issues.

  • Added several helper functions to print and work with Sylvan's BDDs.
  • Added a conversion from LDD to BDD and the necessary utility functions to calculate the bits per levels etc.
  • Added a symbolic bisimulation algorithm based on signature refinement.

Currently brp.mcrl2 shows an inconsistency between ltsconvert and ltsconvertsymbolic with a few hundred states. Ltsconvert claims the minimal bisimulation quotient to contain 293 states (which is most likely correct) whereas ltsconvertsymbolic finds a quotient with 337 states. Several other small examples show correct number of states. Also the implementation is far too slow to be applied to realistic examples, even 1394-fin.mcrl2 takes significant time.

@mlaveaux mlaveaux added the enhancement Something can be improved label Jan 24, 2024
@mlaveaux mlaveaux self-assigned this Jan 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Something can be improved
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant