Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementation of the module for the sensor "SGP30" #199

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vrubel
Copy link

@vrubel vrubel commented Aug 7, 2018

I'm not sure if your policy allows to create submodules. Please look at the proposed changes. If the existence of submodules is unacceptable, I will be ready to suggest an option with copies of files from the vendor's repository.

@loboris
Copy link
Owner

loboris commented Aug 16, 2018

Thank you for the PR.

I would propose to make the MicroWebSrv related PRs directly to the original repository.

I'll look at the proposed SGP30 module. Generally, there are so many I2C sensors that it would be impossible to make the drivers/modules for all of them. Maybe it would be more useful and interesting to create the driver/module in Python, that way the users can learn something analizyng the code (and modify it if necessary) and the performance is usually more tha enough for most I2C devices.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants