Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: retry commands that may segfault #156

Closed

Conversation

siwatanejo
Copy link
Contributor

Retry commands, that may segfault, several times to make CI less flaky.

Retry commands, that may segfault, several times to make CI
less flakey.
Copy link
Collaborator

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

siwatanejo added a commit to packwallet/LdkSharp that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2024
Because it is claimed in upstream PR that this
has been fixed:
lightningdevkit#156
siwatanejo added a commit to packwallet/LdkSharp that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2024
This reverts commit 65e3756
because it is claimed in upstream PR that this
has been fixed:
lightningdevkit#156
siwatanejo added a commit to packwallet/LdkSharp that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2024
This reverts commit 65e3756
because it is claimed in upstream PR that this
has been fixed:
lightningdevkit#156
@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing as fixed elsewhere.

@siwatanejo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@TheBlueMatt are you sure we don't need a retry? Latest master branch's CI status has several jobs failing, e.g. all the osx ones and the java_bindings one.

@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

The java one is indeed spurious, but just retrying isn't really a solution, github needs to fix their CI so that it has access to connect to github.com. The macOS ones have been broken for some time, they won't pass on a restart either.

@siwatanejo
Copy link
Contributor Author

siwatanejo commented Mar 21, 2024

BTW, I see that jobs in master branch which don't correspond to a tag fail as well, because the invokation to git describe --tag HEAD will fail in that case. Shouldn't then those jobs be restricted to tags only, e.g. via adding if: startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/') to the job(s), or job step(s)?

@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

Probably, but I haven't bothered.

@siwatanejo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok, I'll see if I contribute that improvement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants