Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #7479 from fsmunoz/update-blogging-process
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Update blogging process description
  • Loading branch information
k8s-ci-robot committed Aug 18, 2023
2 parents a37f36c + d94675e commit 7e507ce
Showing 1 changed file with 146 additions and 40 deletions.
186 changes: 146 additions & 40 deletions communication/contributor-comms/blogging-resources/blog-guidelines.md
Expand Up @@ -2,50 +2,136 @@

This initiative falls under the [Contributor Comms Charter](./CHARTER.md).

We are looking for Kubernetes-curious community members who are **interested in writing** and **care about getting the word out** to our huge community of users, developers, and contributors of all types. Here's how to get involved.
We are looking for Kubernetes-curious community members who are
**interested in writing** and **care about getting the word out** to
our huge community of users, developers, and contributors of all
types. Here's how to get involved.

## Requested Content

We are looking for content related to the contributor experience and with increasing the visibility of Kubernetes and how it is developed: this includes interviews with SIGs, articles on how to better use existing tools and processes, and in general tips and suggestions on how to collaborate.
We are looking for content related to the contributor experience and
with increasing the visibility of Kubernetes and how it is developed:
this includes interviews with SIGs, articles on how to better use
existing tools and processes, and in general tips and suggestions on
how to collaborate.

Other types of content, like Kubernetes capabilities, tutorials, and technical articles, are better suited for the [SIG-Docs blogging initiative](/sig-docs/blog-subproject/README.md).
Other types of content, like Kubernetes capabilities, tutorials, and
technical articles, are better suited for the [SIG-Docs blogging
initiative](/sig-docs/blog-subproject/README.md).

## Where to publish

As mentioned, the focus of the Contributor Experience articles is targeted at those that contribute to Kubernetes, but sometimes it's not obvious where a specific theme will fit. The following are the most common situations:

1. Article is just for [k8s.dev](http://k8s.dev/blog): this is when it is relevant for the contributor community, and not necessarily for Kubernetes end-users. An example is an article explaining how to use some specific tool or automation that helps with the Kubernetes development process.
2. Article is just for [kubernetes.io](https://kubernetes.io/blog/): when the article targets Kubernetes end-users, and not specifically the contributor community. Examples include most technical articles on Kubernetes features, updates on new features and deprecations, etc.
3. Article is relevant for both: sometimes, an article will be relevant to both the Kubernetes end-users, and the contributor community. Examples include interviews with SIGs and WGs, articles on technical aspects that are important for the contributor community, etc.

The decision on what is the right option will be made jointly by the SIG Contribex Comms and the SIG Docs Blogging editorial team: as a content writer you shouldn't be overly concerned about it, except in how it can change the approval process, as described below.
As mentioned, the focus of the Contributor Experience articles is
targeted at those that contribute to Kubernetes, but sometimes it's
not obvious where a specific theme will fit. The following are the
most common situations:

1. Article is just for [k8s.dev](http://k8s.dev/blog): this is when it
is relevant for the contributor community, and not necessarily for
Kubernetes end-users. An example is an article explaining how to
use some specific tool or automation that helps with the Kubernetes
development process.
2. Article is just for [kubernetes.io](https://kubernetes.io/blog/):
when the article targets Kubernetes end-users, and not specifically
the contributor community. Examples include most technical articles
on Kubernetes features, updates on new features and deprecations,
etc.
3. Article is relevant for both: sometimes, an article will be
relevant to both the Kubernetes end-users, and the contributor
community. Examples include interviews with SIGs and WGs, articles
on technical aspects that are important for the contributor
community, etc.

The decision on what is the right option will be made jointly by the
SIG Contribex Comms and the SIG Docs Blogging editorial team: as a
content writer you shouldn't be overly concerned about it, except in
how it can change the approval process, as described below.

## Submission and review process

The quickest way to get involved is to let the team in [#sig-contribex-comms](https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C03KT3SUJ20) know that you have an idea for an article; the team will identify the best target for your submission and liaison with the necessary teams, if needed. To reduce the amount of editing done directly in GitHub, a two-stage approach is highly recommended.

This process is initiated in [#sig-contribex-comms](https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C03KT3SUJ20) and uses the processes from the SIG Docs blog [subproject](/sig-docs/blog-subproject/README.md), and is broadly as follows:

1. Present your idea to the community, by going to the [#sig-contribex-comms](https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C03KT3SUJ20) Slack channel, or by joining the [weekly meeting](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KDoqbw2A6W7rLSbIRuOlqH8gkoOnp2IHHuV9KyJDD2c). This will make it easier to coordinate effort and avoid duplicate effort, as well as to gather initial suggestions around the article scope.
2. The submission idea will be reviewed by the team, including the decision on where to publish it; someone from the SIG Contribex Comms team will reach out to the [#sig-docs-blog](https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/CJDHVD54J) editorial team to clarify if the content is adequate for republishing in the main Kubernentes blog. At this stage an editor should be assigned to follow-up the process with you.
3. Create your proposal draft in [Google Docs](https://docs.google.com/) or HackMD (https://hackmd.io), and ask for a review in [the channel](https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C03KT3SUJ20). This will facilitate easier editing, especially if major changes or restructuring is needed. Take into account the [documentation style guide](https://kubernetes.io/docs/contribute/style/style-guide/): these guidelines can help in improving the readability of your article, especially in terms of the use of Kubernetes terminology.
4. Once you have reflected any feedback in the proposal draft, announce that the article is ready for submission (again, in the channel or in one of the weekly meetings): the assigned editor will use the final text to open the PR, adding you as a Co-author.
5. (Optional) If the submission will be mirrored in the main Kubernetes site, a second PR will be opened by the editor, but on the main repository, and after being approved in the `contributor-site` one.

For now, our official process is to use [SIG Docs' system](/sig-docs/blog-subproject/README.md), with one change: instead of directly creating the file in the Kubernetes site repository, as instructed above it's initially created in the [contributor-site](https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site), in the appropriate folder (i.e. the right year in `contributor-site/content/en/blog/`).

This will lead to an initial review process before it gets mirrored to the main Kubernetes site.
The quickest way to get involved is to let the team in
[#sig-contribex-comms](https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C03KT3SUJ20)
know that you have an idea for an article; the team will identify the
best target for your submission and liaison with the necessary teams,
if needed. To reduce the amount of editing done directly in GitHub, a
two-stage approach is highly recommended.

This process is initiated in
[#sig-contribex-comms](https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C03KT3SUJ20)
and uses the processes from the SIG Docs blog
[subproject](/sig-docs/blog-subproject/README.md), and is broadly as
follows:

1. Present your idea to the community, by going to the
[#sig-contribex-comms](https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C03KT3SUJ20)
Slack channel, or by joining the [weekly
meeting](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KDoqbw2A6W7rLSbIRuOlqH8gkoOnp2IHHuV9KyJDD2c). This
will make it easier to coordinate effort and avoid duplicate
effort, as well as to gather initial suggestions around the article
scope.
2. The submission idea will be reviewed by the team, including the
decision on where to publish it; someone from the SIG Contribex
Comms team will reach out to the
[#sig-docs-blog](https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/CJDHVD54J)
editorial team to clarify if the content is adequate for
republishing in the main Kubernentes blog. At this stage an editor
should be assigned to follow-up the process with you.
3. Create your proposal draft in [Google
Docs](https://docs.google.com/) or HackMD (https://hackmd.io), and
ask for a review in [the
channel](https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C03KT3SUJ20). This
will facilitate easier editing, especially if major changes or
restructuring is needed. Take into account the [documentation style
guide](https://kubernetes.io/docs/contribute/style/style-guide/):
these guidelines can help in improving the readability of your
article, especially in terms of the use of Kubernetes terminology.
4. Once you have reflected any feedback in the proposal draft,
announce that the article is ready for submission (again, in the
channel or in one of the weekly meetings): the assigned editor will
use the final text to open the PR, adding you as a Co-author.
5. (Optional) If the submission will be mirrored in the main
Kubernetes site, a second PR will be opened by the editor, but on
the main repository. The content of both should be the same, with
the applicable differences (e.g., file location, metadata). The
review process primarily happens in the `contributor-site` PR, with
all the changes then copied over to the `website` after approval.

For now, our official process is to use [SIG Docs'
system](/sig-docs/blog-subproject/README.md), with one change: instead
of directly creating the file in the Kubernetes site repository, as
instructed above it's initially created in the
[contributor-site](https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site), in
the appropriate folder (i.e. the right year in
`contributor-site/content/en/blog/`).

This will lead to an initial review process before it gets mirrored to
the main Kubernetes site.

### Editor instructions

Once the text is final, an editor will open the PR. This facilitates the approval process and prevents articles with massive restructuring or changes needed to be submitted to GitHub, something that makes the review process substantially more difficult.
Once the text is final, an editor will open the PR. This facilitates
the approval process and prevents articles with massive restructuring
or changes needed to be submitted to GitHub, something that makes the
review process substantially more difficult.

In order to keep the authorship information (which will make the
submission count towards the contribution of the article author),
editors must [add the original author as a
co-author](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/committing-changes-to-your-project/creating-and-editing-commits/creating-a-commit-with-multiple-authors). This
is done by adding `Co-authored-by: original-author-name
<original-author@example.com>` to the commit message.

In order to keep the authorship information (which will make the submission count towards the contribution of the article author), editors must [add the original author as a co-author](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/committing-changes-to-your-project/creating-and-editing-commits/creating-a-commit-with-multiple-authors). This is done by adding `Co-authored-by: original-author-name <original-author@example.com>` to the commit message.

The number of PRs depends on where the article will be published:

1. If it's solely for the Contributor site: the PR should be opened in the [contributor-site](https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site), after which the process ends.
2. If it's to be mirrored in the main Kubernetes blog: after the previous step, a new PR is opened on [kubernetes/website](https://github.com/kubernetes/website), mentioning the original PR. The SIG-Docs Blog editorial team will, in this case, already been notified and involved in the initial PR.
1. If it's solely for the Contributor site: the PR should be opened in
the
[contributor-site](https://github.com/kubernetes/contributor-site),
after which the process ends.
2. If it's to be mirrored in the main Kubernetes blog: after the
previous step, a new PR is opened on
[kubernetes/website](https://github.com/kubernetes/website),
mentioning the original PR. The SIG-Docs Blog editorial team will,
in this case, already been notified and involved in the initial PR.


## Blogger Expectations, Responsibilities, and Information
Expand All @@ -54,18 +140,27 @@ Anyone is welcome to contribute when they have time.

If you would like to be listed as a member of the team, here are the expectations:

1. Be prepared to write one blog a quarter and participate in edits to other articles. The time commitment is typically 5-10 hours per quarter depending on the number of blog posts in the review queue.
2. Bloggers are expected to attend at least one Contributor Comms team meeting a month or check-in to remain active.
3. Remain non-partial: if you receive a request to write about a project, an individual, or a group of people from your employer, you should ask an impartial blogger to write it.
4. As with all contribution to Kubernetes, adhere to the [code of conduct](/code-of-conduct.md), values, and principles of the project.
1. Be prepared to write one blog a quarter and participate in edits to
other articles. The time commitment is typically 5-10 hours per
quarter depending on the number of blog posts in the review queue.
2. Bloggers are expected to attend at least one Contributor Comms team
meeting a month or check-in to remain active.
3. Remain non-partial: if you receive a request to write about a
project, an individual, or a group of people from your employer,
you should ask an impartial blogger to write it.
4. As with all contribution to Kubernetes, adhere to the [code of
conduct](/code-of-conduct.md), values, and principles of the
project.

## How to Write an Effective Blog

Keep the following points in mind as you write in order to speed up the review process:

* Use inclusive language understandable by everyone
* Rephrase gendered pronouns (change "he" or "she" to "they" or adjust to remove)
* Remember nothing is simple when you're starting out (remove "just," "simply", and "easy")
* Rephrase gendered pronouns (change "he" or "she" to "they" or
adjust to remove)
* Remember nothing is simple when you're starting out (remove
"just," "simply", and "easy")
* Define terminology or acronyms (do not assume people know what a term means)
* Shy away from jargon and colloquial expressions
* Write clearly and avoid ambiguous sentences
Expand All @@ -74,19 +169,30 @@ Keep the following points in mind as you write in order to speed up the review p
* Design a beginning, middle, and end to your story with a clear call to action
* Provide evidence and data where applicable, to back up your message
* Make the article visually appealing
* Include at least one image (and use public domain or Creative Commons licensed ones)
* Prefer inclusive images like those from [WOCinTech](https://www.flickr.com/photos/wocintechchat/) and [Queer in Tech](https://www.flickr.com/photos/mapbox/albums/72157713100349311)
* Find images on sites like [Creative Commons](https://search.creativecommons.org/), [Pexels](https://www.pexels.com/public-domain-images/), and [Unsplash](https://unsplash.com/images/stock/public-domain))
* Include at least one image (and use public domain or Creative
Commons licensed ones)
* Prefer inclusive images like those from
[WOCinTech](https://www.flickr.com/photos/wocintechchat/) and
[Queer in
Tech](https://www.flickr.com/photos/mapbox/albums/72157713100349311)
* Find images on sites like [Creative
Commons](https://search.creativecommons.org/),
[Pexels](https://www.pexels.com/public-domain-images/), and
[Unsplash](https://unsplash.com/images/stock/public-domain))
* Be accountable and honest as an author
* Remove anything that lacks adequate evidence
* Avoid interjecting personal reactions
* Ensure that the blog post is reviewed by the anyone being mentioned in the piece
* As the author, never talk about your employer, sell, promote, or pitch; this is about upstream community endeavours and the individuals and groups that create it
* As the author, never talk about your employer, sell, promote, or
pitch; this is about upstream community endeavours and the
individuals and groups that create it
* Follow the [documentation style guide](https://kubernetes.io/docs/contribute/style/style-guide/).

## Further Recommendations

The following are helpful resources for authoring articles:

* [Creating Quality Content (For Search Engines and People)](https://moz.com/blog/quality-blog-content)
* [How to write effective documentation for your open source project](https://opensource.com/article/20/3/documentation)
* [Creating Quality Content (For Search Engines and
People)](https://moz.com/blog/quality-blog-content)
* [How to write effective documentation for your open source
project](https://opensource.com/article/20/3/documentation)

0 comments on commit 7e507ce

Please sign in to comment.