Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix number of reconcilers for Pod integration #1835

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 13, 2024

Conversation

alculquicondor
Copy link
Contributor

@alculquicondor alculquicondor commented Mar 13, 2024

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

There were 2 problems:

  • The Pod reconciler doesn't use For, which controller-runtime uses to map to groupKindConcurrency.
  • The GroupKind is actually just Pod, not Pod..

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Thanks to @gabesaba for spotting the problem.
It's not easy to test this issue, but I did a manual run to verify the number of reconcilers.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Fix the configuration for the number of reconcilers for the Pod integration. It was only reconciling one group at a time.

Change-Id: If8f430731a6967a361d0f5172ed408f57a0687bc
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Mar 13, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alculquicondor

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from trasc March 13, 2024 20:07
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 13, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 13, 2024

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 56ddd2d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-kueue/deploys/65f20778c0ab6900087b7028

@yaroslava-serdiuk
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 13, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 98f059704ecd982913c6eabcd1f8b211a3559222

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 391943c into kubernetes-sigs:main Mar 13, 2024
14 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.7 milestone Mar 13, 2024
@alculquicondor
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-0.6

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@alculquicondor: new pull request created: #1837

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-0.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

vsoch pushed a commit to researchapps/kueue that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2024
Change-Id: If8f430731a6967a361d0f5172ed408f57a0687bc
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants