Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure vendor checks are run for all modules #1085

Conversation

bells17
Copy link
Contributor

@bells17 bells17 commented May 11, 2024

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

As observed in the PR below, the current vendor tests might not always detect if go mod tidy or similar commands have been run in the external-snapshotter when changes are made in the client module.
#1073

To address this, in this PR, I have made the following enhancements:

  1. Added vendor checks for the client module
  2. Enhanced vendor checks for the external-snapshotter

These changes aim to reduce the risk of vendor updates being overlooked.

refs:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels May 11, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels May 11, 2024
@bells17
Copy link
Contributor Author

bells17 commented May 11, 2024

/cc @xing-yang

@bells17 bells17 force-pushed the ensure-vendor-checks-for-all-modules branch from 6a7b979 to 5e6eb91 Compare May 11, 2024 04:12
@xing-yang
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 12, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bells17, xing-yang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 12, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 5e3a4ea into kubernetes-csi:master May 12, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants