-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: upload coverage of unittests together #2301
chore: upload coverage of unittests together #2301
Conversation
Before this each run for respective OS carried out upload to codecov server however this consumes codecov tokenless upload limit. Signed-off-by: Matej Vašek <mvasek@redhat.com>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2301 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 60.53% 64.76% +4.22%
==========================================
Files 127 127
Lines 14779 11476 -3303
==========================================
- Hits 8946 7432 -1514
+ Misses 4933 3145 -1788
+ Partials 900 899 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
PTAL @dsimansk |
Signed-off-by: Matej Vašek <mvasek@redhat.com>
@matejvasek wrt/ Codecov ~6% drop. Isn't unified uploader missing some reports? Update, actually it's stated in the dashboard. Hence different count of reports shouldn't be a problem, if we have same content, right? |
Yes, there should be less reports since three reports were merged into one. I have no idea why the coverage decreased. |
Strangely, it reports head 14 uploads vs. now 6 uploads. It's really off. |
I would not expect that this would be needed for codecov upload. Signed-off-by: Matej Vašek <mvasek@redhat.com>
name: "Upload coverage" | ||
runs-on: "ubuntu-latest" | ||
steps: | ||
- uses: actions/checkout@v4 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@matejvasek really surprising find. :)
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dsimansk, matejvasek The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Upload results of unit tests on various operating systems at once as opposed to uploading them individually.