Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature to ability monitor traffic between cape result server and sandbox. #2116

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

piolug93
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@piolug93 piolug93 marked this pull request as ready for review May 10, 2024 13:24
@doomedraven
Copy link
Collaborator

fix conflicts plz, and do not modify conf/routing.conf those config shouldnt be touched, only .default

@doomedraven
Copy link
Collaborator

and what is adventage of using nat instead of hostonly?

@piolug93
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay will resolve conflicts. Hostonly is still used, while MASQUERADE is not used in iptables. Another feature is the use of vrf so that traffic to resultserver passes by default gateway instead of through the interface lo.

@nbargnesi
Copy link
Contributor

Great idea @piolug93. There's a lot of interesting stuff going on behind the scenes - alongside the result server traffic, agent communication and layer 2 traffic would be helpful to expose in analyses.

Did you consider adding an auxiliary module alongside the existing sniffer?

The existing sniffer heavily filters traffic (also #L139, auxiliary.conf) - having the ability to monitor result server, agent, and layer 2 traffic with auxiliary module and write out an analysis-debug.pcap to capture it all would be fantastic!

@piolug93
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good to know about it, I had no idea about it. I haven't plans for write auxiliary module because i no need see that traffic in CAPE.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants