Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nclient6: Use cenkalti/backoff/v4 library to replace backoff algorith… #439

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

heinz-boehmer
Copy link

…m in #296.

@heinz-boehmer heinz-boehmer marked this pull request as ready for review August 11, 2021 23:50
dhcpv6/nclient6/client.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
dhcpv6/nclient6/client.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
…m in insomniacslk#296

Signed-off-by: Heinz Boehmer Fiehn <heinzboehmer@google.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 25, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #439 (1a30de3) into master (b259fbf) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #439      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.97%   67.97%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          90       90              
  Lines        3766     3759       -7     
==========================================
- Hits         2560     2555       -5     
+ Misses       1037     1035       -2     
  Partials      169      169              
Flag Coverage Δ
integtests ∅ <ø> (∅)
unittests 67.97% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
dhcpv6/nclient6/client.go 45.67% <100.00%> (-1.07%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b259fbf...1a30de3. Read the comment docs.

@pmazzini
Copy link
Collaborator

I am not a huge fan of introducing a new dependency but I also don't have a strong opinion here. So I will let others chime in.

@pmazzini
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #308

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants