Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HSEARCH-4542 .within() and .withinAny() for the range predicate #4160

Conversation

marko-bekhta
Copy link
Member

@marko-bekhta marko-bekhta force-pushed the feat/HSEARCH-4542-within-and-withinAny-for-the-range-predicate branch from f8e6ca4 to c5ac711 Compare May 10, 2024 13:36
Copy link
Member

@yrodiere yrodiere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks; a few comments below.

FWIW, I think aligning on the syntax of the terms predicate is better than aligning on the syntax of the range aggregation.

I even wonder if we should change the syntax of the range aggregation... This .range(....).range(...) is quite awkward, too. Not in this PR for sure, though :)

@marko-bekhta marko-bekhta force-pushed the feat/HSEARCH-4542-within-and-withinAny-for-the-range-predicate branch from c5ac711 to 74660ec Compare May 16, 2024 20:02
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented May 16, 2024

@yrodiere yrodiere merged commit d7e88c8 into hibernate:main May 17, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants