This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 7, 2020. It is now read-only.
Add an architecture decision record directory #495
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
See https://adr.github.io/ Add lightweight documents defining architectural decisions taken at a point in time, so that the discussion around the decision-making process is not lost. To me this would include changes like deciding to do away with most of the sub-projects, the decision to bring in IdeM and IdeGhcM, and so on. We do not have to retroactively document these, but it gives us a place to capture decisions at least.
Closed
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See https://adr.github.io/
Add lightweight documents defining architectural decisions taken at a
point in time, so that the discussion around the decision-making
process is not lost.
To me this would include changes like deciding to do away with most of
the sub-projects, the decision to bring in IdeM and IdeGhcM, and so
on.
We do not have to retroactively document these, but it gives us a
place to capture decisions at least.