Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wrong reference #35092

Merged
merged 3 commits into from May 8, 2024
Merged

Wrong reference #35092

merged 3 commits into from May 8, 2024

Conversation

danielthorvil
Copy link
Contributor

I think line 249 is meaning to reference to the "when" functionality, not the "on_failure" functionality.

Fixes #

Target Release

1.8.x

Draft CHANGELOG entry

NEW FEATURES | UPGRADE NOTES | ENHANCEMENTS | BUG FIXES | EXPERIMENTS

I think line 249 is meaning to reference to the "when" functionality, not the "on_failure" functionality.
Copy link

hashicorp-cla-app bot commented Apr 28, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@crw
Copy link
Collaborator

crw commented Apr 29, 2024

Thanks for this submission!

@crw
Copy link
Collaborator

crw commented Apr 29, 2024

Given the way the rest of this document is written, I believe the original text is actually what is intended (even though the next section is on when, there is in fact a section farther down describing on_failure). If you think this is incorrect, please let me know and I will also run this past another person on the team just to check my thinking. Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@trujillo-adam trujillo-adam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for calling attention to this. It is very easy to see how the original text is ambiguous. We need to do a better job of following our own style guide. I think these suggestions will clear things up.

website/docs/language/resources/provisioners/syntax.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
website/docs/language/resources/provisioners/syntax.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@trujillo-adam trujillo-adam added the tw-reviewed Technical Writing has reviewed this PR. label May 7, 2024
crw and others added 2 commits May 8, 2024 15:16
Co-authored-by: trujillo-adam <47586768+trujillo-adam@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: trujillo-adam <47586768+trujillo-adam@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@crw crw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving after merging trujillo-adam's changes

@crw crw added the 1.8-backport If you add this label to a PR before merging, backport-assistant will open a new PR once merged label May 8, 2024
@crw
Copy link
Collaborator

crw commented May 8, 2024

Hi @danielthorvil, I went ahead and committed those changes and approved this PR based on the new changes. I am going to merge this PR, if you feel there is anything else you want to change please feel free to open a new PR. Thanks very much!

@crw crw merged commit 014e4f8 into hashicorp:main May 8, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 8, 2024

Reminder for the merging maintainer: if this is a user-visible change, please update the changelog on the appropriate release branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1.8-backport If you add this label to a PR before merging, backport-assistant will open a new PR once merged documentation tw-reviewed Technical Writing has reviewed this PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants