Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JWT: Find login and email claims with JMESPATH #85305
JWT: Find login and email claims with JMESPATH #85305
Changes from 3 commits
fe3fa35
0e145b4
4a499d2
bdade19
d81d9fc
b3f0c0b
cfee8c6
430a1ce
6485462
9cdef9d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of marshaling/unmarshaling you can use
map[string]any(claims)
in the code.Example:
Because
claims
's type isJWTClaims
which is a "redefinition ofDynMap
->map[string]any
, so because of this the underlying jmespath lib cannot work without the type conversion tomap[string]any
, because it checks formap[string]any
, but it receivesJWTClaims
.I don't think the custom type definitions (without any functions attached to those) provides any benefit here. So we could remove
JWTClaims
and usemap[string]any
instead to make the code simpler. @kalleep wdyt?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I think it makes sense, either solution would work but I think I would prefer to remove the custom definition
JwtClaims
and just return map[string]any for the reasons @mgyongyosi statedThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As suggested, I have replaced
JWTClaims
withmap[string]any
and removed the conversions of claims to map. Looks much cleaner!