Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support VIEWs in metadata queries #632

Closed
olavloite opened this issue Oct 2, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #633
Closed

Support VIEWs in metadata queries #632

olavloite opened this issue Oct 2, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #633
Assignees
Labels
api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc API. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@olavloite
Copy link
Collaborator

Cloud Spanner now supports VIEWs: https://cloud.google.com/spanner/docs/data-definition-language#view_statements

These should show up with table type VIEW in the JDBC metadata queries for tables.

@olavloite olavloite added the type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. label Oct 2, 2021
@olavloite olavloite self-assigned this Oct 2, 2021
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc API. label Oct 2, 2021
olavloite added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 2, 2021
- Report views with table type VIEW in metadata queries.
- Allow applications to filter for VIEWs in metadata queries

Fixes #632
thiagotnunes pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 11, 2021
- Report views with table type VIEW in metadata queries.
- Allow applications to filter for VIEWs in metadata queries

Fixes #632
gcf-merge-on-green bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2021
🤖 I have created a release \*beep\* \*boop\*
---
## [2.5.0](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc/compare/v2.4.5...v2.5.0) (2021-10-25)


### Features

* support VIEW in metadata queries ([#633](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc/issues/633)) ([b929191](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc/commit/b929191a7b6699f9daf9a7c06097e9794c79ff8d)), closes [#632](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc/issues/632)


### Bug Fixes

* **java:** java 17 dependency arguments ([#1266](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc/issues/1266)) ([#645](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc/issues/645)) ([0474502](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc/commit/0474502936ff1a43244fcb830fecfc5f42895899))


### Dependencies

* update dependency com.google.cloud:google-cloud-shared-dependencies to v2.4.0 ([#641](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc/issues/641)) ([ab26010](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc/commit/ab26010ba107d4ba9591d661743ad542ae3b227f))
* update dependency com.google.cloud:google-cloud-spanner-bom to v6.13.0 ([#637](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc/issues/637)) ([d981c8c](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc/commit/d981c8c744829aa039b16df0b150caf49a99f1cc))
* update dependency com.google.cloud:google-cloud-spanner-bom to v6.14.0 ([#647](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc/issues/647)) ([3cda837](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc/commit/3cda83737c25c8878d19bee1727de84e086065b6))
* upgrade Mockito to support Java17 ([#635](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc/issues/635)) ([d78792f](https://www.github.com/googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc/commit/d78792f7acdd2fdac8a655fba06789ba50457679))
---


This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/java-spanner-jdbc API. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant