docs: fix javadoc formatting #343
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
One of the descriptions of the supported connection properties missed an ending </code> block, which caused the entire formatting to be incorrect. Fixes #342
google-cla
bot
added
the
cla: yes
product-auto-label
bot
added
the
api: spanner
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #343 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 71.35% 71.35%
Complexity 1114 1114
=========================================
Files 24 24
Lines 3474 3474
Branches 531 531
=========================================
Hits 2479 2479
Misses 778 778
Partials 217 217
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
elharo
approved these changes
Feb 3, 2021
thiagotnunes
approved these changes
Feb 8, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
One of the descriptions of the supported connection properties missed an ending
</code>block, which caused the entire formatting to be incorrect.Fixes #342