Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deps: update dependency com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java to v3.11.3 #52

Closed

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate-bot renovate-bot commented Feb 3, 2020

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java patch 3.11.1 -> 3.11.3

Renovate configuration

馃搮 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

馃殾 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

鈾伙笍 Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or if you tick the rebase/retry checkbox below.

馃敃 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@trusted-contributions-gcf trusted-contributions-gcf bot added the kokoro:run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Feb 3, 2020
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Feb 3, 2020
@yoshi-kokoro yoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Feb 3, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 3, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #52 into master will decrease coverage by 0.94%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master      #52      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     71.11%   70.16%   -0.95%     
+ Complexity      197      184      -13     
============================================
  Files            28       28              
  Lines          1357     1314      -43     
  Branches          3        3              
============================================
- Hits            965      922      -43     
  Misses          389      389              
  Partials          3        3
Impacted Files Coverage 螖 Complexity 螖
...igquery/storage/v1beta1/BigQueryStorageClient.java 68.75% <0%> (-1.84%) 16% <0%> (-3%)
...ery/storage/v1beta1/BaseBigQueryStorageClient.java 68.75% <0%> (-1.84%) 16% <0%> (-3%)
...y/storage/v1alpha2/stub/GrpcBigQueryWriteStub.java 78.37% <0%> (-1.63%) 7% <0%> (-1%)
...gquery/storage/v1beta2/BaseBigQueryReadClient.java 48.48% <0%> (-1.52%) 7% <0%> (-1%)
...d/bigquery/storage/v1beta2/BigQueryReadClient.java 51.51% <0%> (-1.43%) 8% <0%> (-1%)
...ery/storage/v1beta2/stub/GrpcBigQueryReadStub.java 89.74% <0%> (-0.62%) 9% <0%> (-1%)
...storage/v1beta2/stub/BigQueryReadStubSettings.java 84.16% <0%> (-0.52%) 12% <0%> (酶)
.../storage/v1beta1/stub/GrpcBigQueryStorageStub.java 92.62% <0%> (-0.51%) 11% <0%> (-1%)
...rage/v1beta1/stub/BigQueryStorageStubSettings.java 84.28% <0%> (-0.44%) 14% <0%> (酶)
...storage/v1beta2/stub/EnhancedBigQueryReadStub.java 82.5% <0%> (-0.43%) 6% <0%> (-1%)
... and 2 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
螖 = absolute <relative> (impact), 酶 = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 24bf682...aea4c78. Read the comment docs.

@trusted-contributions-gcf trusted-contributions-gcf bot added the kokoro:run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Feb 3, 2020
@stephaniewang526
Copy link
Contributor

fixed in #53

@renovate-bot renovate-bot deleted the renovate/protobuf.version branch February 3, 2020 19:56
shubhwip pushed a commit to shubhwip/java-bigquerystorage that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. kokoro:run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants