Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(bigquery): add create job method #9882

Conversation

HemangChothani
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #9781

@HemangChothani HemangChothani requested a review from a team November 22, 2019 05:44
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Nov 22, 2019
@HemangChothani HemangChothani changed the title Bigquery add create job method feat(bigquery): add create job method Nov 22, 2019
job_config (dict): configuration job representation returned from the API.

Keyword Arguments:
source (Union[ \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These arguments are quite odd to be including in a generic "create job" function.

Better to add the needed properties to the relevant -JobConfig classes.

@HemangChothani HemangChothani added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Dec 6, 2019
@yoshi-kokoro yoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Dec 6, 2019
@HemangChothani
Copy link
Contributor Author

HemangChothani commented Dec 6, 2019

Unit test is failing which is unrelated to these changes. I think it's related to PR 9915.
May i create another PR to fix unit test issue?

@HemangChothani
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tswast PTAL!

@HemangChothani
Copy link
Contributor Author

Suppressed by googleapis/python-bigquery#32

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants