Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add options to the listReleases and listTags function #485

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alexcanessa
Copy link
Member

@alexcanessa alexcanessa commented Oct 12, 2017

The request to get the list of releases and tags should have the options object in order to pass pagination options.

@see https://developer.github.com/v3/#pagination

@alexcanessa alexcanessa changed the title Add options to the listReleases function Add options to the listReleases and listTags function Oct 12, 2017
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 12, 2017

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@24223f7). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #485   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   91.06%           
=========================================
  Files             ?       12           
  Lines             ?      403           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?      367           
  Misses            ?       36           
  Partials          ?        0
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
lib/Repository.js 80.67% <100%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 24223f7...a37e56f. Read the comment docs.

@j-rewerts
Copy link
Member

I'm wondering if there's maybe an alternative way to handle paging. This is going to be an issue with basically every get operation this library does. Would it be crazy to think about doing some sort of async iterables approach? The new for await ... of seems pretty cool, but wouldn't work for us, since we also allow people to use callbacks.

What if we used generators and for people using callbacks, we just accumulated the result and returned that. For people using Promises, we could yield Promises until the results are done. It looks like yield was added in Node 4, but has no IE support.

@clayreimann Which browsers and versions does github-api support?

@j-rewerts
Copy link
Member

Just adding options to most GETs would definitely work though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants