kitinerary-workbench/kitinerary-workbench: add 9999 #988
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/849098 Signed-off-by: Gerion Entrup <gerion.entrup@flump.de>
gerion0
force-pushed
the
kitinerary-workbench
branch
from
67303f0
to
01eedfa
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The whole ebuild is oriented on
kde-misc/itinerary(copied and adapted).I'm not entirely sure about the dependencies. I took them out of the CMakelists.txt but have a full KDE desktop installed, so I might miss something.
Also, the package builds and runs fine against the released versions of kpkpass and kitinerary (24.02.1 in my case) but the
PVCUTvariable forces portage to install the9999versions of these packages. Since I took the ebuild ofkde-misc/itineraryand it shows the same behavior I guess that's intented but unfortunate personally (I try to reduce git packages).Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/849098