Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

profiles: mask dev-lang/python[jit] on musl #36685

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

vimproved
Copy link
Contributor

@vimproved vimproved commented May 15, 2024

As of now, Python does not support the new JIT on musl, see https://peps.python.org/pep-0744/#support. While it may still theoretically work, musl triples cause the hardcoded target triple check to fail.

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/931772


Please check all the boxes that apply:

  • I can submit this contribution in agreement with the Copyright Policy.
  • I have certified the above via adding a Signed-off-by line to every commit in the pull request.
  • This contribution has not been created with the assistance of Natural Language Processing artificial intelligence tools, in accordance with the AI policy.
  • I have run pkgcheck scan --commits --net to check for issues with my commits.

Please note that all boxes must be checked for the pull request to be merged.

As of now, Python does not support the new JIT on musl, see
https://peps.python.org/pep-0744/#support. While it may still
theoretically work, musl triples cause the hardcoded target triple
check to fail.

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/931772
Signed-off-by: Violet Purcell <vimproved@inventati.org>
@gentoo-bot
Copy link

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @vimproved
Areas affected: profiles
Packages affected: (none)

@gentoo/github

Linked bugs

Bugs linked: 931772

New packages

This Pull Request appears to be introducing new packages only. Due to limited manpower, adding new packages is considered low priority. This does not mean that your Pull Request will not receive any attention, however, it might take quite some time for it to be reviewed. In the meantime, your new ebuild might find a home in the GURU project repository: the ebuild repository maintained collaboratively by Gentoo users. GURU offers your ebuild a place to be reviewed and improved by other Gentoo users, while making it easy for Gentoo users to install it and enjoy the software it adds.


In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of ConductCopyright policy (expl.) ● DevmanualGitHub PRsProxy-maint guide

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added need assignment It was impossible to assign the PR correctly. Please assign it manually. bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. labels May 15, 2024
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2024-05-15 15:05 UTC
Newest commit scanned: fa01649
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/a459bbdbf9/output.html

@mgorny
Copy link
Member

mgorny commented May 15, 2024

I wanted to try if it is actually broken first, to be honest. I'd find it surprising if JIT would actually rely on specific libc.

@thesamesam
Copy link
Member

Given how brittle the mechanism for the JIT is, I'm fine with this for now, and we can revisit it later. There's enough py3.13 bugs already.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. need assignment It was impossible to assign the PR correctly. Please assign it manually.
Projects
None yet
5 participants