Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gcc ci continue by @cooljeanius #96

Open
wants to merge 31 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

talregev
Copy link

continue work of my linux ci by @cooljeanius
cooljeanius#2

talregev and others added 30 commits July 9, 2023 19:58
try using bootstrap-lean instead of bootstrap
hopefully this goes quicker...
all right, never mind about tags...
trim down build a bit
I don't get why it needs to compile before building the docs...
docbuilding is annoying
more reordering
latest error was:
"/usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: cannot find crti.o: No such file or directory"
last build timed out; let's see if we can fix that...
add mailutils dependency to see if that will let the mailing of the testresults work properly
`Mail` might be missing...
2 more mailer suggestions
from @ArsenArsen
ok so I guess it isn't called just "exim" exactly
exim4-base says that postfix conflicts with it
2 more mail dependencies
tweak mailx dependency
remove msmtp-mta
(conflicts with exim4-config)
try seeing if there are more ways to upload logfiles
"upload-artifact" doesn't allow relative paths, apparently
Merge from my `me/CI` branch
@cooljeanius
Copy link
Contributor

(To be clear I'm not submitting this myself because I am adhering to the norms against submitting PRs here; I only submitted one against the submitter's fork because that was a fork, and not this mirror)

@jwakely
Copy link
Contributor

jwakely commented Feb 21, 2024

It's not just a "norm" to not submit here, it's completely pointless because nobody involved with the gcc project has any control of this repo and can't merge these pull requests anyway.

@talregev
Copy link
Author

talregev commented Feb 21, 2024

I already send a patch to gcc for the ci and my PR.
They didn't respond.
Doing a PR to here is not pointless.
As you can see, because of of my PR to here, @cooljeanius take my work and continue and improve it.
So even if gcc official don't look at this repo, other from gcc community does. And that how you can share knowledge.

@cooljeanius
Copy link
Contributor

cooljeanius commented Feb 21, 2024

It's not just a "norm" to not submit here, it's completely pointless because nobody involved with the gcc project has any control of this repo and can't merge these pull requests anyway.

Yes, that's why I did 2b9778c. I didn't mean to diminish the pointlessness of submitting here by referring to the discouragement against doing so as a "norm", that was just the first word that came to mind.

@frederick-vs-ja
Copy link

I wonder whether it's possible to add some github-actions to transform a PR on gcc-mirror to a mail to the GCC mailing list.

@cooljeanius
Copy link
Contributor

I wonder whether it's possible to add some github-actions to transform a PR on gcc-mirror to a mail to the GCC mailing list.

That's what the git project does with gitgitgadget, but that would require someone to get it set up here: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/gitgitgadget

@jwakely
Copy link
Contributor

jwakely commented May 18, 2024

There are no admins for this repo. My guess is GitHub set it up but they deny it!

@jwakely
Copy link
Contributor

jwakely commented May 18, 2024

Also many of the pull requests are complete junk, like trying to merge all of trunk into the gcc-10 branch or similar nonsense.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
4 participants