Skip to content

BLURtooth: Exploiting Cross-Transport Key Derivation in Bluetooth Classic and Bluetooth Low Energy [CVE-2020-15802] [CVE-2022-20361]

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

francozappa/blur

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

3 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

README

Repository about the BLUR attacks presented at AsiaCCS'22 in the paper titled: BLURtooth: Exploiting Cross-Transport Key Derivation in Bluetooth Classic and Bluetooth Low Energy.

Useful links: pdf, video, slides, website.

BibTex entry:

@inproceedings{antonioli22blur,
    author={Antonioli, Daniele and Tippenhauer, Nils Ole and Rasmussen, Kasper
    and Payer, Mathias},
    title={{BLURtooth: Exploiting Cross-Transport Key Derivation in
    Bluetooth Classic and Bluetooth Low Energy}},
    booktitle={Proceedings of the  Asia conference on computer and
    communications security (ASIACCS)},
    month={May},
    year={2022}
}

The BLUR attacks have been assigned CVE-2020-15802 and CVE-2022-20361.

Initialization

In the remaining of the README we indicate Bluetooth Classic (aka BR/EDR) as BT Bluetooth Low Energy as BLE, and Cross-Transport Key Derivation as CTKD. We also assume that the attack device and the victims support BT,BLE and CTKD. This means that the devices support Bluetooth 4.2+ and BT/BLE Secure Connections.

The easiest way to perform the attacks is to use one device both as a victim and attack device. For example, we recommend to use a Linux laptop as victim/attack device and any other device as the other victim.

We are using a Linux machine running bluez and bluez tools. We rely on the btmgmt tool and might be helpful to skim its source code. In particular we use its pair sub-command as, among others, it allows to send arbitrary pairing requests over BT/BLE while declaring arbitrary input-output capabilities.

Usage: pair [-c cap] [-t type] <remote address>

If you want to reproduce the exact attack scenario presented in our paper you must do some extra work. Specifically you need to reproduce the setup presented in BIAS attack. Once your setup is ready you should be able to use the development board as your BT/BLE Controller, and the Linux laptop as a Host. Moreover, you should be able to sniff the link layer packets from the Host (e.g., BT LMP traffic) and to dynamically patch the firmware of the development board at runtime using internalblue.

Perform the BLUR attacks

Hardcode NoInputNoOutput Capabilities (w/o unsetting the MitM flag)

This step is optional and requires patching your own Linux kernel.

When using btmgmt -c 3 bluez automatically unsets the MitM protection flag, e.g., it sets the AuthReq byte to 0x02 other than 0x03. However, the BLUR attacks do not require to unset this flag but only require to declare NoInputNoOutput capabilities when the remote device supports input-output capabilities. Doing this trick the pairing procedure is downgraded to Just Works without unsetting the MitM flag.

Implementing this setup requires a minimal modification of the Linux kernel. In particular, in /net/bluetooth/hci_event.c we change:

cp.authentication = conn->auth_type;

to:

cp.authentication = 0x03;

Doing so, we hardcode our AuthReq flag to 0x03 regardless of the input-output capabilities that we declare.

Legitimate pairing

Pair the victim devices as usual. For example, if you are targeting a smartphone pair it with your laptop (acting both as a victim and attack device). Some user interaction might be required as part of pairing (e.g., Numeric Comparison).

Open a btmgmt shell

  • Take note of the victim Bluetooth address, indicated as REMOTE-BTADD
  • Open a terminal
  • Run hciconfig and take note of your hci index, .e.g, 0
  • Run sudo btmgmt -i 0
  • You should see a blue terminal prompt containing [hci0] #

Central Impersonation attack over BLE, [over]writing BT pairing key

Here I'm assuming that the victim is using a public BLE address. If it is using a random one change the -t option to 2

From the btmgmt CLI run:

pair -t 1 REMOTE-BTADD

If you need also to downgrade association to Just Works run:

pair -c 3 -t 1 REMOTE-BTADD

The -c flag set the input-output capabilities of the attacker and a value of 0x3 maps to NoInputNoOutput, while the default value for a laptop/smartphone is 0x1 mapping to Display Yes/No.

Peripheral Impersonation attack over BT, [over]writing BLE pairing key

In this case even if we impersonate a BLE peripheral we pair over BT as the Central.

From the btmgmt CLI run:

pair -t 0 REMOTE-BTADD

If you need also to downgrade association to Just Works run:

pair -c 3 -t 0 REMOTE-BTADD

Unindented session attacks

Repeat the attacks described above while impersonating a device that is currently unknown to (i.e., not paired with) the victim.

Q&A (Bluetooth, CTKD, Linux, bluez, Wireshark)

How do I set my BT/BLE device discoverable/connectable/pairable?

From the bluetoothctl CLI you can set discoverable to on or off and pairable. From the btmgmt CLI you can also set the connectable flag.

How can I control for how long my device is discoverable?

From bluetoothctl, you can control the discoverability timeout using discoverable-timeout, e.g., if you set it to 0 the device is always discoverable.

How can I check if my BT/BLE device support pairing or is pairable?

For BT, while pairing with a remote device either as a Central or a Peripheral, you will receive the following LMP packet: LMP not accepted ext (opcode: 0x02) with pairing not allowed (error code: 0x18)

For BLE, while pairing with a remote device either as a Central or a Peripheral, you will receive the following SMP packet: SMP Pairing Failed Command (opcode 0x05) with Pairing Not Supported (reason 0x05).

How can I check if my BT/BLE device support Secure Connections?

For BT, while pairing with a remote device look at Secure Connections support for the Host and the Controller in the LMP feature packages, e.g., using the following Wireshark display filter: btbrlmp.efeat.scc or btbrlmp.efeat.sch.

For BLE, while pairing with a remote device in the SMP Pairing Request or Response check the AuthReq byte containing the Secure Connection flag, e.g., using the following Wireshark display filter: btsmp.sc_flag == 1.

How can I check if my BT/BLE device support CTKD?

For BT, while pairing with a remote device the BLE SMP traffic is tunneled over L2CAP. Hence by using the btl2cap.payload Wireshark filter you should see one packet from the Central to the Peripheral containing a payload starting with 0x01 (SMP Pairing Request) and another packet in the other direction with a payload beginning with 0x02 (SMP Pairing Response). Then you should also see other raw L2CAP packets encoding the SMP key distribution phase.

For BLE, while pairing with a remote device in the SMP Pairing Request or Response check that both the Central and the Peripheral are willing to send and receive a link key during SMP key distribution, e.g., use the following Wireshark filter btsmp.key_dist_linkkey or btsmp.key_dist_linkkey.

About

BLURtooth: Exploiting Cross-Transport Key Derivation in Bluetooth Classic and Bluetooth Low Energy [CVE-2020-15802] [CVE-2022-20361]

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages