Convert to ESM #49
Open
Convert to ESM #49
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
LinusU
reviewed
Apr 21, 2021
LinusU
reviewed
Apr 21, 2021
LinusU
reviewed
Apr 21, 2021
|
I think that this is a good approach forward. While I did like Browserify, the avalanche have started and it's too late for the pebbles to vote, the ecosystem is shifting to ESM which also is the "native" module system for browsers. Also, you can get support via either esmify or babelify... That being said, if you (@feross) think it's to early to switch I don't have a too strong opinion on this |
LinusU
reviewed
Apr 23, 2021
Co-authored-by: Linus Unnebäck <linus@folkdatorn.se>
|
@feross I thought I'd check in on this. I'm happy to take another approach if you have some thoughts. Thanks! |
|
@feross any thoughts on how we might best be able to support ESM? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An alternative to #40 for comparison which does not introduce
microbundle