Tutorial for inteference #3450
Draft
Tutorial for inteference #3450
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
|
I love the idea of this! Great initiative! I'm thinking we make a subsection in the docs under tutorials for inference. I'll give your notebook a thorough review with some feedback later today, but it looks really good! Just a few touch ups I think and it'll be set. |
|
Thanks @muellerzr I appreciate the feedback. As the pr stands it adds a production tab with inference as a subsection.
|
|
I'd recommend something like this:
Given your tutorial is tabular specific |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
At the moment Fast the moment the documentation is a bit spare on production so I'm proposing to add tutorials for it starting with inference.
Should I be making this pr against the
docs submodule?Any thoughts on what I have so far would also be appreciated.