Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remote_receiver: document using multiple with receiver_id #3811

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: current
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

azrdev
Copy link
Contributor

@azrdev azrdev commented May 3, 2024

Description:

Having multiple remote_receiver requires them to being a list, otherwise they're silently merged.
When using them in binary_sensor, receiver_id is undocumented so far, but omitting it fails to compile with the error

binary_sensor.remote_receiver: [source IR_receiver.yml:59]

  Too many candidates found for 'receiver_id' type 'remote_base::RemoteReceiverBase' Some are 'F1000a_rx', 'TSOP31238'.

Related issue (if applicable): none

Pull request in esphome with YAML changes (if applicable): none

Checklist:

  • I am merging into next because this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.
    or

  • I am merging into current because this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.

  • Link added in /index.rst when creating new documents for new components or cookbook.

Copy link

netlify bot commented May 3, 2024

Deploy Preview for esphome ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit cb9acc0
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/esphome/deploys/66356c1f81e10c0008030623
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3811--esphome.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant