Add xxhash benches #10
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
warn(unused_parens)
even with features "mum32bit" all checks and tests pass
all tests pass. was there a reason to pin versions?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I wanted to compare the more upto date xxhash-rust (xxh3) with wyhash
it seems smaller hashes wyhash is faster and larger hashes wyhash is faster
test wyhash_bench::hash_004_bytes ... bench: 2 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 2000 MB/s
test wyhash_bench::hash_007_bytes ... bench: 2 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 3500 MB/s
test wyhash_bench::hash_008_bytes ... bench: 2 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 4000 MB/s
test wyhash_bench::hash_009_bytes ... bench: 3 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 3000 MB/s
test wyhash_bench::hash_012_bytes ... bench: 3 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 4000 MB/s
test wyhash_bench::hash_016_bytes ... bench: 3 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 5333 MB/s
test wyhash_bench::hash_032_bytes ... bench: 2 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 16000 MB/s
test wyhash_bench::hash_128_bytes ... bench: 7 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 18285 MB/s
test wyhash_bench::hash_1_kilo_bytes ... bench: 56 ns/iter (+/- 10) = 18285 MB/s
test wyhash_bench::hash_1_mega_bytes ... bench: 69,603 ns/iter (+/- 7,315) = 15065 MB/s
test wyhash_bench::hash_256_bytes ... bench: 14 ns/iter (+/- 2) = 18285 MB/s
test wyhash_bench::hash_512_bytes ... bench: 27 ns/iter (+/- 2) = 18962 MB/s
test wyhash_bench::hash_u64 ... bench: 0 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 8000 MB/s
test xxh3::hash_004_bytes ... bench: 11 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 363 MB/s
test xxh3::hash_007_bytes ... bench: 17 ns/iter (+/- 4) = 411 MB/s
test xxh3::hash_008_bytes ... bench: 12 ns/iter (+/- 3) = 666 MB/s
test xxh3::hash_009_bytes ... bench: 16 ns/iter (+/- 3) = 562 MB/s
test xxh3::hash_012_bytes ... bench: 16 ns/iter (+/- 2) = 750 MB/s
test xxh3::hash_016_bytes ... bench: 11 ns/iter (+/- 5) = 1454 MB/s
test xxh3::hash_032_bytes ... bench: 11 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 2909 MB/s
test xxh3::hash_128_bytes ... bench: 14 ns/iter (+/- 3) = 9142 MB/s
test xxh3::hash_1_kilo_bytes ... bench: 52 ns/iter (+/- 4) = 19692 MB/s
test xxh3::hash_1_mega_bytes ... bench: 49,757 ns/iter (+/- 12,517) = 21073 MB/s
test xxh3::hash_256_bytes ... bench: 24 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 10666 MB/s
test xxh3::hash_512_bytes ... bench: 33 ns/iter (+/- 7) = 15515 MB/s
test xxh3::hash_u64 ... bench: 11 ns/iter (+/- 3) = 727 MB/s