Add testthat helper state

[etiennebacher]

easystats/easystats#388

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.34%. Comparing base (f044e18) to head (0a8d4e6).
Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head 0a8d4e6 differs from pull request most recent head 79c22c1

Please upload reports for the commit 79c22c1 to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #465      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.73%   90.34%   -0.40%     
==========================================
  Files          75       73       -2     
  Lines        5809     5696     -113     
==========================================
- Hits         5271     5146     -125     
- Misses        538      550      +12     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[IndrajeetPatil]

There is one warning. Strange that the workflow isn't failing.

Warning (test-standardize_models.R:285:1): brms
Global state has changed:
names(before[[4]])[93:98] vs names(after[[4]])[93:100]
  "PERFLOG_LOCATION_SETTING"
  "PIPX_BIN_DIR"
  "PIPX_HOME"
  "PKGCACHE_HTTP_VERSION"
+ "PKG_CPPFLAGS"
+ "PKG_LIBS"
  "POWERSHELL_DISTRIBUTION_CHANNEL"
  "PROCESSX_PSXCINVC0FQM_1697110500"
  "PWD"                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
before[[4]][93:98] vs after[[4]][93:100]
  PERFLOG_LOCATION_SETTING"RUNNER_PERFLOG"
  PIPX_BIN_DIR"/opt/pipx_bin"
  PIPX_HOME"/opt/pipx"
  PKGCACHE_HTTP_VERSION"2"
+ PKG_CPPFLAGS"  -I\"/home/runner/work/_temp/Library/Rcpp/include/\"  -I\"/home/runner/work/_temp/Library/RcppEigen/include/\"  -I\"/home/runner/work/_temp/Library/RcppEigen/include/unsupported\"  -I\"/home/runner/work/_temp/Library/BH/include\" -I\"/home/runner/work/_temp/Library/StanHeaders/include/src/\"  -I\"/home/runner/work/_temp/Library/StanHeaders/include/\"  -I\"/home/runner/work/_temp/Library/RcppParallel/include/\"  -I\"/home/runner/work/_temp/Library/rstan/include\" -DEIGEN_NO_DEBUG  -DBOOST_DISABLE_ASSERTS  -DBOOST_PENDING_INTEGER_LOG2_HPP  -DSTAN_THREADS  -DUSE_STANC3 -DSTRICT_R_HEADERS  -DBOOST_PHOENIX_NO_VARIADIC_EXPRESSION  -DBOOST_NO_AUTO_PTR  -include '/home/runner/work/_temp/Library/StanHeaders/include/stan/math/prim/fun/Eigen.hpp'  -D_REENTRANT -DRCPP_PARALLEL_USE_TBB=1 "
+ PKG_LIBS" '/home/runner/work/_temp/Library/rstan/lib//libStanServices.a' -L'/home/runner/work/_temp/Library/StanHeaders/lib/' -lStanHeaders -L'/home/runner/work/_temp/Library/RcppParallel/lib/' -ltbb "
  POWERSHELL_DISTRIBUTION_CHANNEL"GitHub-Actions-ubuntu22"
  PROCESSX_PSXCINVC0FQM_1697110500"YES"
  PWD"/home/runner/work/datawizard/datawizard"
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
```

[etiennebacher]

Which workflow is this?

[IndrajeetPatil]

https://github.com/easystats/datawizard/actions/runs/6495062798/job/17639250287?pr=465

[etiennebacher]

Actually, maybe this check-tests-warnings is broken? I removed all tests but one in datawizard and put a warning() call inside. Then I ran:

options(crayon.enabled = TRUE, warn = 2L)
devtools::test()

and it showed a test warning but not a failure

[IndrajeetPatil]

Strange. This is what we used initially to detect test warnings

Will have a look.

Can you please create an issue in our workflows repository?

[etiennebacher]

I see that all CI is passing now, @IndrajeetPatil can this be merged or are you experimenting with the warnings workflow?

[etiennebacher]

So there's a bunch of CI failures for various reasons (#509, pak installation failures, Matrix issues, etc.) but none that are due to this PR so I merge this.