Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Choosing mesh compression type per primitive #929

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

marwie
Copy link
Contributor

@marwie marwie commented Apr 30, 2023

Hello,

as suggested in the discussion here I've started adding the skips in draco

and tried to add it to meshopt too but this is not yet working. I'm still including the commit here for talking about the approach (I tried skipping meshopt for every second primitive (or rather all accessors that are used by every second primitive))

Copy link
Contributor Author

@marwie marwie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The model I've been testing with: CarbonFrameBike.zip

Falsely skipped meshopt results in:
image

@donmccurdy donmccurdy added this to the v3.6 milestone Aug 22, 2023
@donmccurdy
Copy link
Owner

Hi @marwie, sorry for the slow followup on this – are you still interested in supporting per-primitive compression? And, am I correct in understanding that the PR currently is expected to work trivially for Draco, but will need more investigation for Meshopt?

@donmccurdy donmccurdy modified the milestones: v3.6, Backlog Aug 31, 2023
@marwie
Copy link
Contributor Author

marwie commented Sep 2, 2023

Hey no problem. For draco it seemed to work easily yes but I didnt get it to work with meshopt and didnt have time to look into it yet.
I think it would still be useful to have this working but it is not urgent. But in general I would like to understand what I was missing to get it to work with meshopt

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants