SEAB-6420: Add new health check names to endpoint allowableValues

[svonworl]

Description
This PR adds liquibaseLock and elasticSearchConsistency to the list of allowed values for the include parameter of the health check endpoint. It also removes the obsolete @ApiParam annotation.

Review Instructions
Confirm that the new values appear in openapi.yaml.

Issue
https://ucsc-cgl.atlassian.net/browse/SEAB-6420

Security and Privacy

No concerns.

• Security and Privacy assessed

e.g. Does this change...

• Any user data we collect, or data location?
• Access control, authentication or authorization?
• Encryption features?

Please make sure that you've checked the following before submitting your pull request. Thanks!

• Check that you pass the basic style checks and unit tests by running mvn clean install
• Ensure that the PR targets the correct branch. Check the milestone or fix version of the ticket.
• Follow the existing JPA patterns for queries, using named parameters, to avoid SQL injection
• If you are changing dependencies, check the Snyk status check or the dashboard to ensure you are not introducing new high/critical vulnerabilities
• Assume that inputs to the API can be malicious, and sanitize and/or check for Denial of Service type values, e.g., massive sizes
• Do not serve user-uploaded binary images through the Dockstore API
• Ensure that endpoints that only allow privileged access enforce that with the @RolesAllowed annotation
• Do not create cookies, although this may change in the future
• If this PR is for a user-facing feature, create and link a documentation ticket for this feature (usually in the same milestone as the linked issue). Style points if you create a documentation PR directly and link that instead.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.81%. Comparing base (142f581) to head (b698290).

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #5883      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      73.83%   73.81%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity      5265     5263       -2     
=============================================
  Files            371      371              
  Lines          19211    19211              
  Branches        2012     2012              
=============================================
- Hits           14184    14181       -3     
- Misses          4070     4072       +2     
- Partials         957      958       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
bitbuckettests	27.11% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
integrationtests	58.43% <ø> (ø)
languageparsingtests	11.07% <ø> (ø)
localstacktests	21.68% <ø> (ø)
toolintegrationtests	30.47% <ø> (ø)
unit-tests_and_non-confidential-tests	28.33% <ø> (-0.12%)	⬇️
workflowintegrationtests	38.65% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.