Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[GraphBolt][CUDA] Other example cuda versions #6958

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mfbalin
Copy link
Collaborator

@mfbalin mfbalin commented Jan 16, 2024

Description

The examples left out from #6861.

Google colab demo here: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1AMnK9YlEP5dSWiz1Kg6V6DdVjsiSeN75?usp=sharing

Checklist

Please feel free to remove inapplicable items for your PR.

  • The PR title starts with [$CATEGORY] (such as [NN], [Model], [Doc], [Feature]])
  • I've leverage the tools to beautify the python and c++ code.
  • The PR is complete and small, read the Google eng practice (CL equals to PR) to understand more about small PR. In DGL, we consider PRs with less than 200 lines of core code change are small (example, test and documentation could be exempted).
  • All changes have test coverage
  • Code is well-documented
  • To the best of my knowledge, examples are either not affected by this change, or have been fixed to be compatible with this change
  • Related issue is referred in this PR
  • If the PR is for a new model/paper, I've updated the example index here.

Changes

@mfbalin mfbalin marked this pull request as draft January 16, 2024 07:54
@dgl-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

dgl-bot commented Jan 16, 2024

To trigger regression tests:

  • @dgl-bot run [instance-type] [which tests] [compare-with-branch];
    For example: @dgl-bot run g4dn.4xlarge all dmlc/master or @dgl-bot run c5.9xlarge kernel,api dmlc/master

@dgl-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

dgl-bot commented Jan 16, 2024

Commit ID: e16ab76c4a74e3ab3ef8b4b612d8c0dfb04ef695

Build ID: 1

Status: ❌ CI test failed in Stage [Torch CPU (Win64) Unit test].

Report path: link

Full logs path: link

@dgl-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

dgl-bot commented Jan 16, 2024

Commit ID: e720b8d96dee60beee7ffec531da88c32d0c7f14

Build ID: 2

Status: ✅ CI test succeeded.

Report path: link

Full logs path: link

@mfbalin mfbalin marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2024 18:36
@dgl-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

dgl-bot commented Jan 16, 2024

Commit ID: 005ff4f

Build ID: 3

Status: ✅ CI test succeeded.

Report path: link

Full logs path: link

@mfbalin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mfbalin commented Jan 18, 2024

@frozenbugs what changes would be required if we wanted to enable GPU sampling in the rest of the examples here? I want to minimize the change to the examples to do this.

I feel that only the lightning example looks a bit too complicated. The line counts of the two other examples don't increase at all.

@dgl-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

dgl-bot commented Jan 18, 2024

Commit ID: 36e6c37

Build ID: 4

Status: ✅ CI test succeeded.

Report path: link

Full logs path: link

@mfbalin mfbalin mentioned this pull request Jan 23, 2024
8 tasks
@dgl-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

dgl-bot commented Jan 23, 2024

Commit ID: 9ad218c

Build ID: 5

Status: ✅ CI test succeeded.

Report path: link

Full logs path: link

@dgl-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

dgl-bot commented Jan 23, 2024

Commit ID: 1240697

Build ID: 6

Status: ✅ CI test succeeded.

Report path: link

Full logs path: link

@dgl-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

dgl-bot commented Jan 31, 2024

Commit ID: e81a62b

Build ID: 7

Status: ✅ CI test succeeded.

Report path: link

Full logs path: link

@mfbalin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mfbalin commented Feb 20, 2024

@Rhett-Ying Are we going to release GPU accelerated R-GCN example? It already works and I think the release blog should mention it.

@dgl-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

dgl-bot commented Feb 20, 2024

Commit ID: b9b4aad

Build ID: 8

Status: ❌ CI test failed in Stage [Torch CPU Example test].

Report path: link

Full logs path: link

@dgl-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

dgl-bot commented Feb 21, 2024

Commit ID: 808349b

Build ID: 9

Status: ✅ CI test succeeded.

Report path: link

Full logs path: link

@dgl-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

dgl-bot commented Feb 22, 2024

Commit ID: 82ce371

Build ID: 10

Status: ✅ CI test succeeded.

Report path: link

Full logs path: link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants