[Rated Disabilities] Integrate new LH endpoint behind feature flag

[jerekshoe]

Summary

Adding versions of the UI components to be used with Lighthouse behind the rd_use_lighthouse feature toggle

Related issue(s)

• Link to ticket created in va.gov-team repo
  [Rated Disabilities to Lighthouse] Implement FE changes va.gov-team#63310

Testing Steps

vets-api

Note: Make sure to pull the latest vets-api-mockdata and vets-api

1. Open settings.local.yml
2. Add the below:

lighthouse:
  veteran_verification:
    host: https://staging-api.va.gov
    form526:
      host: https://staging-api.va.gov
    use_mocks: true

vets-website

Note: Make sure that the rated_disabilities_use_lighthouse feature flag is enabled

1. Log in using mocked auth here

• Credential Service Provider: ID.me
• Profile: vets.gov.user+228@gmail.com

2. Navigate to http://localhost:3001/disability/view-disability-rating/rating

Testing done

Added specs for new components

Screenshots

What areas of the site does it impact?

Rated Disabilities Application

Acceptance criteria

Quality Assurance & Testing

• I fixed|updated|added unit tests and integration tests for each feature (if applicable).
• No sensitive information (i.e. PII/credentials/internal URLs/etc.) is captured in logging, hardcoded, or specs
• Linting warnings have been addressed
• Documentation has been updated (link to documentation *if necessary)
• Screenshot of the developed feature is added
• Accessibility testing has been performed

Error Handling

• Browser console contains no warnings or errors.
• Events are being sent to the appropriate logging solution
• Feature/bug has a monitor built into Datadog or Grafana (if applicable)

Authentication

• Did you login to a local build and verify all authenticated routes work as expected with a test user

⚠️ Team Sites (only applies to modifications made to the VA.gov header) ⚠️

• The vets-website header does not contain any web-components
• I used the proxy-rewrite steps to test the injected header scenario
• I reached out in the #sitewide-public-websites Slack channel for questions

Requested Feedback

(OPTIONAL) What should the reviewers know in addition to the above. Is there anything specific you wish the reviewer to assist with. Do you have any concerns with this PR, why?

[pmclaren19]

Nice much cleaner!

[pmclaren19]

I'd add a screen shot of this and/or a video showing that the link works as expected.
Also looks like we still need a test file and tests for this new component.

[pmclaren19]

There is a ticket/pr for this uswds work so I wouldnt update here its out of scope

[pmclaren19]

if we are adding a new va-alert to rated disabilities that has uswds enabled then we will want to update the ticket here and spreadsheet here to make sure we account for this work.

[jerekshoe]

Added to spreadsheet

[pmclaren19]

if we are adding a new va-alert to rated disabilities that has uswds enabled then we will want to update the ticket department-of-veterans-affairs/va.gov-team#76124 and spreadsheet here to make sure we account for this work.

[jerekshoe]

Added to spreadsheet

[pmclaren19]

if we are adding a new va-alert to rated disabilities that has uswds enabled then we will want to update the ticket department-of-veterans-affairs/va.gov-team#76124 and spreadsheet here to make sure we account for this work.

[jerekshoe]

Added to spreadsheet

[samcoforma]

Do we still need these commented tests?